2010/9/10 Hyrum Wright :
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
>> Hyrum Wright wrote:
*identical_p = TRUE; /* assume TRUE, until disproved below */
- do
+ while (! (done1 || done2))
{
- SVN_ERR(svn_io_file_read_full2(file1_h, buf1,
-
>> * subversion/svnsync/main.c
>> (svnsync_cmd_table): Added svnsync_opt_source_encoding to the list
>> of acceptable options for the init, sync, and copy-revprops
>> subcommands.
>
> Missing indentation on the non-first lines. Should be in one of these forms:
>
> [[[
> * subversion/svnsync/main
Should be fixed now. Thanks.
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 00:06:19 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> The mails coming from the SVN issue tracker (on the issues mailing
> list) still contain the old d...@s.t.o address as reply-to. Could
> someone change this to the d...@s.a.o address?
>
> Cheers
Daniel Trebbien wrote on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:24:29 -0700:
> The test repository (attached) was created with Subversion version
> 1.6.12 (r955767) on a Debian Squeeze AMD64 system.
Since you're working on this code, let me point out that 'svnadmin load'
works at a level below the UTF-8 validati
Daniel Trebbien wrote on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:12:20 -0700:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > The patch didn't make it to the list (only to my personal copy), could
> > you please re-send with the patch in "text/plain" MIME type?
>
> Hmmm. I wonder if adding a .txt
Hi,
The mails coming from the SVN issue tracker (on the issues mailing
list) still contain the old d...@s.t.o address as reply-to. Could
someone change this to the d...@s.a.o address?
Cheers,
--
Johan
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:45 PM, wrote:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3474
>
> --- Additional comments from joha...@tigris.org Fri Sep 10 14:45:17 -0700
> 2010 ---
> This issue seems to be fixed on trunk. The described scenario now goes as
> follows:
>
> (assumi
Note: I was using the GNU Nano repository (svn://svn.sv.gnu.org/nano)
to test my changes, but it's not ideal because the first commit where
the --source-encoding feature is needed is revision 619. Also, as of
now, 29 of the 4518 commits have non-ASCII log messages with 21
encoded in ISO-8859-1 and
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> The patch didn't make it to the list (only to my personal copy), could
> you please re-send with the patch in "text/plain" MIME type?
Hmmm. I wonder if adding a .txt extension will work...
Index: subversion/svnsync/sync.h
===
Daniel Trebbien writes:
> [[[
> Add a command line option to the svnsync init, sync, and copy-revprops
> subcommands (--source-encoding) that allows the user to specify the
> character encoding of translatable properties from the source
> repository. This is needed to allow svnsync to import some
The patch didn't make it to the list (only to my personal copy), could
you please re-send with the patch in "text/plain" MIME type?
Daniel Trebbien wrote on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 09:10:08 -0700:
> [[[
> Add a command line option to the svnsync init, sync, and copy-revprops
> subcommands (--source-e
[[[
Add a command line option to the svnsync init, sync, and copy-revprops
subcommands (--source-encoding) that allows the user to specify the
character encoding of translatable properties from the source
repository. This is needed to allow svnsync to import some older
Subversion repositories that
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:47:39PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> > Sent: vrijdag 10 september 2010 15:26
> > To: Bert Huijben
> > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r995475 -
> > /subversion
Erik Huelsmann writes:
> There are however, a few queries in 'entries.c' which operate directly on
> BASE_/WORKING_NODE. These queries will need to be migrated. However, in our
> old entries, we don't have the concept of op_depths and op roots. That makes
> it a bit hard to migrate the entries fi
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99
> > where the benefits are desirable? When Subversion was started, C89 was about
> > a decade old, and C99 is ju
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: vrijdag 10 september 2010 15:26
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r995475 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c
>
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:58:10PM +0
Today, I finished replacing all NODE_DATA queries (UPDATE/DELETE/INSERT) in
wc_db.c by queries which operate on NODES. From here on, I'll start to write
code to query BASE_NODE+NODES and WORKING_NODE+NODES, verifying that both
tables return the same results.
There are however, a few queries in 'en
On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99
> where the benefits are desirable? When Subversion was started, C89 was about
> a decade old, and C99 is just as old now...
Microsoft's C compiler, to name only one, still does
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:58:06PM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Thu Sep 9 22:58:06 2010
> New Revision: 995603
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=995603&view=rev
> Log:
> Try really hard to help the compiler generate good code
> for this frequently called func
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:58:10PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > @@ -524,9 +524,11 @@ parse_property_block(svn_stream_t *strea
> >else if ((buf[0] == 'D') && (buf[1] == ' '))
> > {
> >char *keybuf;
> > + apr_int64_t len;
> >
> > + SVN_ERR(svn_cstring
Lieven Govaerts wrote on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:46:55 +0200:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > [ I'm only talking about the ra_serf tests in this email ]
> >
> > When I build the atomic-revprop branch against serf r1408, I see that:
> >
> > * diff_tests 24 29 (and man
On 10.09.2010 01:45, Hyrum Wright wrote:
> [1] Well, I've no way of knowing if it was infinite or just taking a
> long time, but I'll defer a solution to the Halting Problem as an
> exercise for the reader. :)
Step 1: Pull plug from power socket.
Step 2: Check if program is still running. If it is
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 9 september 2010 18:56
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: [RFC] 'base' is what in --accept=base?
>
> What do we expect 'svn merge --accept=base' to do when encountering
> text conflicts?
(Guessing:
23 matches
Mail list logo
