[Posting here as 'svn log --show-diff' is currently only available in trunk]
Hi All,
I am trying out 1.7.0 (yes, I know it's a bit early) and noticed that svn log
now supports --show-diff. It's very convenient, thanks.
As the comments in the code explain, in case the path was created in some
r
Hi Daniel,
> Do you have any installed svn in $prefix? If so, can you remove that one
> and try again?
Yes, this was the issue.
Thanks for pointing this out!
Regards,
Alexey.
On Friday, August 13, 2010 05:21:00 pm Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> No issues here building svnsync or pristine-store-test.
>
No issues here building svnsync or pristine-store-test.
Have you re-run autogen.sh?
Do you have any installed svn in $prefix? If so, can you remove that one
and try again?
Alexey Neyman wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 16:38:55 -0700:
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like the revision r984280 broke the --w
Hi all,
It looks like the revision r984280 broke the --with-neon configuration. I
could compile r984212 with --with-neon, but r984280 gives:
cd subversion/tests/libsvn_wc && /usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --tag=CC --
silent --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -pthread -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNE_LFS-
On 08/13/2010 01:04 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
> svn_log_changed_path2_t is defined as a structure starting with the exact
> same definition as svn_log_changed_path_t. So any svn_log_changed_path2_t
> instance can be seen as a svn_log_changed_path_t, but you miss some
> fields that way.
>
> The pr
> -Original Message-
> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net]
> Sent: vrijdag 13 augustus 2010 18:40
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: Confusing svn_log_entry_t docstrings.
>
> Can someone help me make sense of some of our public docstrings? I'm
> looking at the svn_
Can someone help me make sense of some of our public docstrings? I'm
looking at the svn_log_entry_t structure, and I see the following:
typedef struct svn_log_entry_t
{
/** A hash containing as keys every path committed in @a revision; the
* values are (#svn_log_changed_path_t *) stuctures.
On 08/12/2010 05:46 PM, Роман Донченко wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato писал в своём письме Fri, 13 Aug
> 2010 00:41:36 +0400:
>
>> Simplest recipe I can find:
>>
>> $ python -c 'from svn import client, core;
>> ctx = client.svn_client_ctx_t();
>> ctx.config = core.svn_config_get_config(None)'
>> Trac
Should this test be XFail over dav, rather than just skipped? It
seems like a reasonable operation to be doing over dav.
-Hyrum
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:32 AM, wrote:
> Author: sbutler
> Date: Fri Aug 13 10:32:14 2010
> New Revision: 985152
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=985152&vie
On 08/12/2010 05:25 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Thu Aug 12 21:25:11 2010
> New Revision: 984984
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=984984&view=rev
> Log:
> Eliminate redundant revprop lookups: Exports / checkouts often
> contain multiple nodes from the same revis
We're in the process of updating our subversion servers. Since we're still
using BDB on the production servers I took the opportunity to compare it
with FSFS.
First the setup:
Machine: Sun Fire V210
OS: Solaris 9
FS: UFS
Subversion: 1.6.12
Apache httpd: 2.2.16
APR
stef...@apache.org writes:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Aug 8 19:41:11 2010
> New Revision: 983474
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983474&view=rev
> Log:
> Memcached is often slower than a single file access.
Doesn't that depend on the type of filesystem used and the resources
allocat
Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:13:10 +0100:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > I figure this patch can't do any harm (except cost another file-read when a
> > write-lock or txn-current-lock is being acquired), and it might as well
> > help, so I committed it in r984990.
>
> >> @@ -594
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> I figure this patch can't do any harm (except cost another file-read when a
> write-lock or txn-current-lock is being acquired), and it might as well
> help, so I committed it in r984990.
>> @@ -594,7 +598,11 @@ static svn_error_t *
>>err = get_lock_on_filesystem(lock
Greg Stein writes:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 14:41, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>...
>>> For example,
>>>
>>> $ svn cp A/B C
>>> $ svn revert C/D/file
>>>
>>> That should error.
>>>
>>> $ svn revert C
>>>
>>> Should succeed, and undo the copy that w
On 12.08.2010 22:29, Loren Cahlander wrote:
After discussing things with Mike, I an going to be making the changes through
the HTTP PROPPATCH method.
...
Great!
If you have protocol (RFC 3253) specific questions, please do not
hesitate to ask. (In doubt cc me directly because I usually do no
16 matches
Mail list logo
