Proposal: Change repository's UUID over RA layer

2010-07-31 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Hi, I've found that I need the functionality to change a repository's UUID over the RA layer in 'svnrdump load' (see my recently committed tests to see why). I initially planned to put this off until functionality until someone thinks I'm capable of handling this and gets me commit access to libsv

Re: svn commit: r981090 - in /subversion/branches/performance/subversion: include/private/svn_serializer.h libsvn_subr/svn_serializer.c

2010-07-31 Thread Greg Stein
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 18:22, Blair Zajac wrote: > > On Jul 31, 2010, at 1:28 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: stefan2 >> Date: Sat Jul 31 20:28:49 2010 >> New Revision: 981090 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981090&view=rev >> Log: >> Introduce a simple serialization framew

Re: [possibly HTTPv2] diff_tests:13/ra_neon fails locally, in a fresh tr...@head checkout

2010-07-31 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Buildbot sees that too over ra_local: http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-slik-w2k3-x64-local/builds/986

Re: svn commit: r981091 - in /subversion/branches/performance/subversion: include/private/svn_file_cache.h libsvn_subr/svn_file_cache.c

2010-07-31 Thread Blair Zajac
On 7/31/10 1:47 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Sat Jul 31 20:46:59 2010 New Revision: 981091 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981091&view=rev Log: Introduce a private file handle cache API and provide an implementation. * subversion/include/private/svn_file_cache.h

[possibly HTTPv2] diff_tests:13/ra_neon fails locally, in a fresh tr...@head checkout

2010-07-31 Thread Daniel Shahaf
I just made a fresh checkout of tr...@r981102 (current HEAD) using a 1.5 client, and I see the following test failure: [[[ 0:svn/trunk.d% make -s && ../runpytest diff 13 --url=http://localhost:8081/trunk2 --http-library neon subversion/svn/diff-cmd.c:402: (apr_err=190001) subversion/libsvn_client

[wc-ng properties and notifications] was: Re: [mergeinfo or wc-ng] 'svn merge -c-N; svn merge -cN' leaving changes behind?

2010-07-31 Thread Daniel Shahaf
By the way: [[[ % rm -rf subversion/mod_dav_svn % ../other_wc/subversion/svn/svn up A subversion/mod_dav_svn Asubversion/mod_dav_svn/merge.c ... Asubversion/mod_dav_svn/mirror.c Conflict for property 'svn:eol-style' discovered on '/home/daniel/src/svn/trunk.d/subve

[mergeinfo or wc-ng] 'svn merge -c-N; svn merge -cN' leaving changes behind?

2010-07-31 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Reverse-merging a change, and then re-merging it, falsely causes 'status' and 'diff' to think the affected files are still changed: [[[ 0:% $svn st (clean; nothing relevant) 0:% $svn merge -c -979045 . --- Reverse-merging r979045 into '.': Usubversion/mod_dav_svn/reports/update.c Usubversi

fs_fs core dumps in checksum code

2010-07-31 Thread Blair Zajac
We run long running, persistent processes that expose the svn_fs and svn_repos APIs via RPC (using ZeroC's Ice). We've seen some occasional core dumps after the processes have been up for two weeks or more. We're running against 1.6.5. The processes have LRU caches of fs_t and repos_t that th

Re: svn commit: r981090 - in /subversion/branches/performance/subversion: include/private/svn_serializer.h libsvn_subr/svn_serializer.c

2010-07-31 Thread Blair Zajac
On Jul 31, 2010, at 1:28 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sat Jul 31 20:28:49 2010 > New Revision: 981090 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981090&view=rev > Log: > Introduce a simple serialization framework that simplifies and > speeds up serialization of most dat

Need fast ways to get Info once WC-NG is introduced

2010-07-31 Thread Stefan Küng
Hi, I think I best first describe what I do in TSVN now: TSVN has a cache of all working copy statuses which is used by the shell extension to show the icon overlays. It would be way too slow to fetch the status every time the shell requests the overlays, so that's why we have that cache. Th

Re: [PATCH] Invoke 'store password' prompt for all commands requiring authentication

2010-07-31 Thread Kannan R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 29 July 2010 01:38 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > Does this need to be fixed for serf too? serf seems to hold good in this case, it was working fine even at the time of submission of this initial patch. - -- Thanks & Regards, Kannan -B