On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 17:55, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>...
> Columns to be placed in NODE_DATA:
>
> * wc_id
> * local_relpath
> * oproot_distance
> * presence
> * kind
> * revnum
revnum is a BASE concept, so it does not belong here. WORKING nodes do
not have a revision until they are committ
As announced by gstein before, we've had some discussion on the
NODE_DATA structure which should allow storing multiple levels of tree
manipulation in our wc-db. This mail aims at describing my progress on
the subject so far. Please review and comment.
Introduction
What's the 4t
Le 09/07/2010 03:59, Konstantin Kolinko a écrit :
> 2010/7/8 Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard :
>> The output of the final svn status -v looks as follows:
>>
>> 21 mpg active-back-then-up/newdir/file
>> 22 mpg active/newdir/file
>>
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:36:35PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 09:52 +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The diff callbacks for handling text have revision arguments. The prop
> > callbacks don't.
> >
> > I'm creating diff headers for the cases when we only have pro
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I object, unless we intend to rigorously police all of the other links
> and keep the page up to date.
I'm sure we can keep track of which third-party packages require
registration. We already police the list to make sure that they keep
the
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> order to download them. Greg and I think we should add "(registration
> required)" tags to the various CollabNet links on packages.html.
> Objections?
For any downloads that require registration, I think that is
appropriate to denote. +1
6 matches
Mail list logo
