-Original Message-
From: 'Stefan Sperling' [mailto:s...@elego.de]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:05 PM
To: Катаргин Алексей
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; n...@chelcom.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sasl service name for svnserve
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:33:03AM +0600, Катаргин Алексей wrot
[C. Michael Pilato]
> IIUC, prior to your change, nobody who had enabled authz at all could
> make use of the SVNListParentPath feature (because the authorization
> for that display would systematically fail). But this also means
> that Subversion never leaked the name of a repository that was
>
+1 to apply
On Apr 12, 2010 3:50 PM, "Daniel Näslund" wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:58:49AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:16, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:07, wrote:
> >>...
> >>...
> >> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/deprecated.c Fri A
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:58:49AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:16, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:07, wrote:
> >>...
> >>...
> >> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/deprecated.c Fri Apr 9 20:07:51
> >> 2010
> >>...
> >> @@ -2515,13 +2551,15 @@ s
>IIUC, prior to your change, nobody who had enabled authz at all could make
>use of the SVNListParentPath feature (because the authorization for that
>display would systematically fail). But this also means that Subversion
>never leaked the name of a repository that was intended to be private/hidd
Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:17, wrote:
> >...
> > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c Fri Apr 9 15:17:06 2010
> > @@ -1059,7 +1059,18 @@ read_entries_new(apr_hash_t **result_ent
> > result_pool);
> >
> > if
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 13:14, Mike Dixon
wrote:
>...
> And so we have identified one of the problems.
>
> If you're serious about getting new people involved in development, getting
> a patch reviewed needs to be *easy*. If someone sends in a patch and it gets
> ignored (not maliciously, of cours
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
When the agenda item for voting new full committers into membership
was on the table, there were no candidates. Think about that: no
new full committers for Subversion in the past year. This is a bad
thing. We need to find a way to embrace and empower would-be
Subvers
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 13:11, Julian Foad wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:35, Julian Foad
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 11:48 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:19, wrote:
>> >> >...
>> >...
>> >> > + SVN_ERR(svn_sqlite__reset(stmt))
Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:35, Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 11:48 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:19, wrote:
> >> >...
> >...
> >> > + SVN_ERR(svn_sqlite__reset(stmt));
> >> > + return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_WC_PATH_NOT_FO
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:35, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 11:48 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:19, wrote:
>> >...
>...
>> > + SVN_ERR(svn_sqlite__reset(stmt));
>> > + return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_WC_PATH_NOT_FOUND, NULL,
>> > +
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 11:48 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:19, wrote:
> >...
> > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c Mon Apr 12 15:19:23 2010
> > @@ -7254,13 +7254,17 @@ svn_wc__db_get_pristine_md5(const svn_ch
> > SVN_ERR(svn_sqlite__step(&have_row, stmt));
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Roderich Schupp wrote:
>> Hi,
>> the fixes for issue 3242 ("Subversion demands unnecessary access
>> to parent directories of operations") currently in trunk do not address
>> scenario gicen below.
>>
>> [[[
>> Fix another scenario related to issue #3242:
>>
>> - user has
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:33:03AM +0600, Катаргин Алексей wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling
> >The patch looks technically correct, but I don't understand why it is
> >needed. Can you explain why it is needed?
> >
> >It sounds to me as if you'd like to forward authenticat
Roderich Schupp wrote:
> Hi,
> the fixes for issue 3242 ("Subversion demands unnecessary access
> to parent directories of operations") currently in trunk do not address
> scenario gicen below.
>
> [[[
> Fix another scenario related to issue #3242:
>
> - user has no access in repo root, only in /
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:19, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c Mon Apr 12 15:19:23 2010
> @@ -7254,13 +7254,17 @@ svn_wc__db_get_pristine_md5(const svn_ch
> SVN_ERR(svn_sqlite__step(&have_row, stmt));
> if (!have_row)
> {
> - *md5_checksum = NULL; /*
Hi Philip,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Philipp Marek
wrote:
> Hello Bert!
>
> On Montag, 12. April 2010, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> Well, on Windows consoles are all 80 characters wide. (You can fix this if
>> you are a frequent Command Prompt User, but most applications just assume
>> 80 chara
Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>> I would expect that a request to the parent directory would yield a
>> listing
>> that included the 'calc' and 'watch' repositories, but not the 'lamp'
>> one.
>>
>> Is that the case?
>>
>>
> No.
>
> These authz rule should *not* list anything inside the repo 'lam
On 04/12/2010 07:49 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
kame...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kameshj
Date: Mon Apr 12 11:26:28 2010
New Revision: 933194
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933194&view=rev
Log:
[issue2753] Fix issue 2753.
Relax requests aimed at the repo Parent path from authz cont
kame...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: kameshj
> Date: Mon Apr 12 11:26:28 2010
> New Revision: 933194
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933194&view=rev
> Log:
> [issue2753] Fix issue 2753.
>
> Relax requests aimed at the repo Parent path from authz control.
>
> * subversion/mod_authz_svn/m
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> While there has been lots of discussion about aspects of the following,
> there really hasn't been any dissent about the core vision and other
> ideas presented below. Given that, I propose that we massage this into
> a public, web-facing statement, and put it on the websi
Hello Bert!
On Montag, 12. April 2010, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Well, on Windows consoles are all 80 characters wide. (You can fix this if
> you are a frequent Command Prompt User, but most applications just assume
> 80 characters on Windows. And in many cases Windows switches back to 80
> characte
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 04:32, Bert Huijben wrote:
>...
>> +def patch_no_index_line(sbox):
>> + "patch with no index lines"
>> +
>> + sbox.build()
>> + wc_dir = sbox.wc_dir
>> +
>> + patch_file_path =
>> tempfile.mkstemp(dir=os.path.abspath(svntest.main.temp_dir))[1]
>
> This line reintroduces
> -Original Message-
> From: Philipp Marek [mailto:philipp.ma...@emerion.com]
> Sent: maandag 12 april 2010 14:43
> To: Hyrum K. Wright
> Cc: dev; Erik Huelsmann; Stefan Sperling; Johan Corveleyn
> Subject: Re: misaligned blame output if repo has >1m revisions
>
> Hello Hyrum!
>
> On Mo
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:16, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:07, wrote:
>>...
>>...
>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/deprecated.c Fri Apr 9 20:07:51
>> 2010
>>...
>> @@ -2515,13 +2551,15 @@ svn_wc_status2(svn_wc_status2_t **status
>> {
>> const char *local_abspath
Hello Hyrum!
On Montag, 12. April 2010, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Philipp Marek
> > So 9 digits should buy a bit of time ;-)
> Sure, but the more digits you put in, the more stuff gets pushed off the
> back of the line. On a 80-character terminal, with code that's
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> Mike and Hyrum,
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:11 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
> > Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the reminder. Merging the changed suggested here (r876245)
> does
> >>> indeed fix the test failure for me.
> >>
> >>
On 9 Apr 2010 20:59, "Greg Stein" wrote:
> Not a new API. Just a revamp of svn_io_open_unique_file3. Compare the
> 1.6.x version against trunk.
> Paul: if you're adventurous, and build your own svn, you could try
> lifting the contents of trunk's svn_io_open_unique_file3, and dropping
> that int
+1
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > [[[
> > Follow-up to r932571. Since converting a svn_wc_status3_t struct to a
> > svn_wc_status2_t dito will be a pretty complex operation, we create a
> > function to handle it.
>
> +1.
>
> - Julian
>
>
> > * sub
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Philipp Marek
wrote:
> Hello Erik!
>
> On Montag, 12. April 2010, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> > wrote:
> > >http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/
> > >Directory revision: 1113881
> > With 3 additional spaces, that would fit, wouldn't it?
> They're doing 100k
> -Original Message-
> From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf
Of
> Hyrum K. Wright
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 9:58 PM
> To: Stefan Sperling
> Cc: Philip Martin; Tim Starling; Greg Stein; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Pushmi support
>
> The last thi
Hello Erik!
On Montag, 12. April 2010, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> wrote:
> >http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/
> >Directory revision: 1113881
> With 3 additional spaces, that would fit, wouldn't it?
They're doing 100k revisions in about 8 months:
1013930 => Fri Aug 21 09:33:02 20
hi Phil,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Philipp Marek
wrote:
> Hello Johan,
> hello Stefan,
>
> On Freitag, 9. April 2010, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:17:12PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> > So I guess this is coming up for you guys when s.a.o reaches the 1
>> > mill
Daniel Näslund wrote:
> [[[
> Follow-up to r932571. Since converting a svn_wc_status3_t struct to a
> svn_wc_status2_t dito will be a pretty complex operation, we create a
> function to handle it.
+1.
- Julian
> * subversion/include/private/svn_wc_private.h
> (svn_wc__status2_from_3): New.
>
Hi!
I'm letting the func return the old struct in the same manner as
svn_wc__cd2_to_cd() works for conflict_description_t. When we start
replacing entries, we might need to return and error instead, but since
the func will only be used in two places I can easily change parameters
and return values
35 matches
Mail list logo
