Hello Erik/Daniel,
Noticed your irc interaction:
15:32 <@ehu> which compiler does the solaris box use?
15:33 <@danielsh> build/hudson/ says?
15:35 <@ehu> doesn't look like it
If you haven't got this information already, here you go:
[hudson] gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-sola
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 06:14:49PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I'm not sure why the test ends up writing "\n" EOL terminators on windows.
The reason is probably that all files created in the greek
tree use "\n". Note that the patched_tempfile isn't actually
patched, because the hunk is rejecte
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 05:33:22PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: rhuij...@apache.org [mailto:rhuij...@apache.org]
> > Sent: zondag 4 april 2010 17:31
> > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: svn commit: r930702 -
> > /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests
> -Original Message-
> From: rhuij...@apache.org [mailto:rhuij...@apache.org]
> Sent: zondag 4 april 2010 17:31
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r930702 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_client/client-test.c
>
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Sun Apr 4 15:3
Committed in r930662 on my branch svn-patch-improvements.
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:25:07PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here's my revised patch. I've commented on the changes inline.
>
> One strange thing: If you compile this you'll get a compiler warning
> about this variable not be
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 10:55:26AM -, dan...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: dannas
> Date: Sun Apr 4 10:55:25 2010
> New Revision: 930662
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930662&view=rev
> Log:
> Make 'svn patch' able to remove dirs beeing empty after patching, taking
> into account bot
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, 1 Apr 2010 at 22:49 +0300:
> The ASF-hosted buildbot can report on IRC (to a channel or in privmsg) the
> status of builds. There was disagreement today on #svn-dev whether it's
> desired. What do people think of having the bot notify on IRC
FTR, no +1's here, so I'
Ping, the bug report below hasn't seen any response yet.
To summarize, 'hotcopy' doesn't lock revprops.db before copying it, and a
thread on the sqlite mailing list warns that doing so may result in
corruption. Note that when revprop packing is enabled, revprops.db is the
only (and authoritati
8 matches
Mail list logo
