Re: [patch] Fix windows build

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 05:52:46PM -0700, Joe Swatosh wrote: >> [[[ >> Follow on to r924760 which removed svn_diff_private.h.  Remove >> svn_diff_private.h >> as a source of exported functions in the windows build. >> ]]] > > +1 to commit (

Re: [patch] Fix windows build

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 05:52:46PM -0700, Joe Swatosh wrote: > [[[ > Follow on to r924760 which removed svn_diff_private.h. Remove > svn_diff_private.h > as a source of exported functions in the windows build. > ]]] +1 to commit (and sorry for breaking the windows build) Stefan > > Index: buil

[patch] Fix windows build

[[[ Follow on to r924760 which removed svn_diff_private.h. Remove svn_diff_private.h as a source of exported functions in the windows build. ]]] Index: build.conf === --- build.conf (revision 925708) +++ build.conf (working copy) @

Re: Issues 3525 & 3526 - please don't forget about these bogus tree conflicts

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:10:06PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Hi devs, > > I know a lot of you are mostly focused on wc-ng work right now (which > is a good thing: focus is good, wc-ng is good). But I'd like to > highlight two other important issues, which can IMHO be very confusing > to user

Issues 3525 & 3526 - please don't forget about these bogus tree conflicts

Hi devs, I know a lot of you are mostly focused on wc-ng work right now (which is a good thing: focus is good, wc-ng is good). But I'd like to highlight two other important issues, which can IMHO be very confusing to users, and which I think should definitely be fixed by 1.7 (or if possible, soone

Re: useful extra check in FS fold_change function

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:04:45PM -0700, David Glasser wrote: > I would like to get a working Subversion development > environment back one of these days, once I re-derive how to work > around the Debian libtool issue again... Compile your own APR libs from source, and svn will use APR's libtool.