Alexey Neyman писал в своём письме Wed, 17 Mar 2010
00:05:01 +0300:
Hi all,
The svn_repos_history2() function allows the history_func() to return a
special error, SVN_ERR_CEASE_INVOCATION, to stop the search. This is not
supported in Python bindings, though: attempt to return
core.SVN_ERR_CE
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:36, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/lock.c Sun Mar 14 14:36:26 2010
> @@ -1789,8 +1789,19 @@ svn_wc__acquire_write_lock(const char **
> SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_read_kind(&kind, wc_ctx->db, child_abspath, FALSE,
>
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> From time to time, I've seen evidence that our trunk code is walking up too
> far in its parent tree as well, but every time I try to create a reliable
> recipe, I can't. I have nothing but wc-1 working copies on my system for
> day-to-day use. (I run subversion 1.6.x b
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 08:29, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c Wed Mar 17 12:29:14 2010
> @@ -582,22 +582,21 @@ svn_wc__prop_array_to_hash(const apr_arr
> apr_pool_t *result_pool)
> {
> int i;
> - apr_hash_t *dav_cache;
> + apr_has
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > * subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
> > (svn_io_file_mktemp):
> > Update prototype. Use svn_path_cstring_from_utf8(), which makes a
> > local copy on all operating systems, to make sure apr never tries to
> > overwrite read only memory on systems with a utf-8 file
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-03-01, kame...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: kameshj
>>> Date: Mon Mar 1 13:48:01 2010
>>> New Revision: 917523
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917523&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> With the below apache configuration(See the char
Julian Foad wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01, kame...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: kameshj
>> Date: Mon Mar 1 13:48:01 2010
>> New Revision: 917523
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917523&view=rev
>> Log:
>> With the below apache configuration(See the character "/svn 1/").
>>
>>
> [...]
>>
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:40:51PM -, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed Mar 17 16:40:51 2010
> New Revision: 924360
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=924360&view=rev
> Log:
> Make svn_io_file_mktemp() behave in the same way on all operating
> systems.
>
> * sub
On Mon, 2010-03-01, kame...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: kameshj
> Date: Mon Mar 1 13:48:01 2010
> New Revision: 917523
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917523&view=rev
> Log:
> With the below apache configuration(See the character "/svn 1/").
>
>
[...]
> Write through proxy is *not* h
phi...@apache.org wrote:
>
> +struct repos_to_wc_copy_baton {
> + const apr_array_header_t *copy_pairs;
> + const char *top_dst_path;
> + svn_boolean_t ignore_externals;
> + svn_ra_session_t *ra_session;
> + svn_client_ctx_t *ctx;
> +};
> +
> +static svn_error_t *
> +repos_to_wc_copy_cb(void
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> julianf...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: julianfoad
> > Date: Wed Mar 17 11:33:45 2010
> > New Revision: 924229
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=924229&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Rename a function parameter to match the doc string. A follow-up to r921503.
> >
>
On Wed, 2010-03-17, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-11, I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> >> Excellent, too. Just one nit: it looks like you intended to rename the
> >> argument "wcprop_changes" to "props".
> >
> > Renamed in r924229.
>
> Thanks. For the record, I hadn'
Julian Foad wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11, I (Julian Foad) wrote:
>> Excellent, too. Just one nit: it looks like you intended to rename the
>> argument "wcprop_changes" to "props".
>
> Renamed in r924229.
Thanks. For the record, I hadn't ignored your review -- I just had left the
changes sitting
julianf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: julianfoad
> Date: Wed Mar 17 11:33:45 2010
> New Revision: 924229
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=924229&view=rev
> Log:
> Rename a function parameter to match the doc string. A follow-up to r921503.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h,
> subversio
On Thu, 2010-03-11, I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> Excellent, too. Just one nit: it looks like you intended to rename the
> argument "wcprop_changes" to "props".
Renamed in r924229.
- Julian
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:34:30PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> Ok, I've already mentioned it but here's my main suggestion:
>
> Git diff format
> -
> svn {diff,patch} should be able to use the git diff format. That would
> allow us to use patches for tree and mode changes. It sh
On Tue, 2010-03-16, Paul Burba wrote:
> Your patch looks good to me. It passes all tests [fsfs x ra_local]
> and I can't see that it will introduce any problems. I assume the
> mergeinfo_tests.py 2 failure you mentioned at the start of the thread
> was solved in v2?
Thanks. Yes, the test failur
17 matches
Mail list logo
