Re: svnserve under Linux inetd hangs, burning CPU cycles, under too low TCP-sendbuffer.

2010-02-26 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
Hi Andreas, thank you for reporting this problem. I am sorry to see that you have received no helpful replies yet. That's probably because many of us are tied up on the road to 1.7. Let me assure you that your mail has arrived in our inboxes. I hope someone familiar with svnserve can reproduce an

Re: [PATCH] fix conflict stats for externals during update

2010-02-26 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
Julian Foad wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote: >> conflict stats don't seem to be printed for externals during update. [...] >> Any objections? Does anyone remember what the rationale was for >> treating externals separately? > > +1 on the change, whether it was broken or not. The whole idea was to

Re: svn commit: r916089 - in /subversion/branches/1.6.x-issue-3242-partial: ./ CHANGES subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c subversion/l

2010-02-26 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:11 PM, C. Michael Pilato > wrote: >> Ivan Zhakov wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:23 AM, wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Thu Feb 25 02:23:24 2010 New Revision: 916089 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916089&view=rev

Re: svn commit: r916089 - in /subversion/branches/1.6.x-issue-3242-partial: ./ CHANGES subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c subversion/l

2010-02-26 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:11 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:23 AM,   wrote: >>> Author: cmpilato >>> Date: Thu Feb 25 02:23:24 2010 >>> New Revision: 916089 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916089&view=rev >>> Log: >>> On the '1.6.x-issu

Re: bug report: ra_serf gets PROPFIND failure on certain non-ASCII paths

2010-02-26 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > Lieven Govaerts wrote: >> [[[ >> ra_serf: Fix support for international characters in paths. [..] > >> [[[ >> Index: subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/merge.c >> === >> --- subversion/libs

Re: two questions (and a proposed patch) regarding svn:ignore

2010-02-26 Thread Peter Samuelson
[C. Michael Pilato] > Peter Samuelson wrote: > > (Come to think of it, I bet a way to specify "all new directories" in > > auto-props would be welcome too.) > > How about "any pattern ending a slash character" meaning "applies to > directories"? Sure. Unix shell globs behave exactly like this (

Re: Subversion is now an official ASF project!

2010-02-26 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 06:12:37PM +0100, Johan Compagner wrote: > > >From branch to 1.7.0 is probably at least a couple months. Possibly > > > > longer. Depends on what shape trunk is in (especially the new working > > > copy format) at the time of branching. > > > > I don't think we'll branch

Re: Web-Site Bug

2010-02-26 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > have found other links which are not working (security ..).. > > added a new patch which summarizes the changes. r916776. Thanks! -- C. Michael Pilato CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand signature.asc Description: O

Re: Bug in svn merge --show-revs eligible ^/subversion/trunk ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x

2010-02-26 Thread Paul Burba
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 03:52:25PM -0500, Paul Burba wrote: >> Stefan, do you recall, or can you make an educated guess as to what >> client version you used to make the 1.6.x-r40452 branch in r880530? > > Must have been a trunk build from

RE: svn commit: r916286 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn: dav_svn.h mirror.c mod_dav_svn.c

2010-02-26 Thread Kamesh Jayachandran
>> I could not see the difference between "svn_uri_canonicalize()" and >> svn_dirent_canonicalize() for the above configuration, by the way both >> fails while proxying. >> >> I have an upcoming local patch in progress attempting to fix the same. >Is it a local disk path? No. >If no, then neve

Re: Subversion is now an official ASF project!

2010-02-26 Thread Johan Compagner
> >From branch to 1.7.0 is probably at least a couple months. Possibly > > longer. Depends on what shape trunk is in (especially the new working > > copy format) at the time of branching. > > I don't think we'll branch before wc-ng is deemed stable. > Porting changes back and forth would be a n

Re: svn commit: r916089 - in /subversion/branches/1.6.x-issue-3242-partial: ./ CHANGES subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c subversion/l

2010-02-26 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:23 AM, wrote: >> Author: cmpilato >> Date: Thu Feb 25 02:23:24 2010 >> New Revision: 916089 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916089&view=rev >> Log: >> On the '1.6.x-issue-3242-partial' branch, merge (with heavy conflict >> resolution) r87

Re: Subversion is now an official ASF project!

2010-02-26 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:03:06AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Johan Compagner] > > and i dont know what it means if you guys say "branch 1.7" does that mean a > > release is created, or does it mean a branch is created and now 1.7 will > > first be tested and all the new features are teste

Re: two questions (and a proposed patch) regarding svn:ignore

2010-02-26 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Peter Samuelson wrote: > (Come to think of it, I bet a way to specify "all new directories" in > auto-props would be welcome too.) How about "any pattern ending a slash character" meaning "applies to directories"? -- C. Michael Pilato CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Developme

Re: Subversion is now an official ASF project!

2010-02-26 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Johan Compagner] > and i dont know what it means if you guys say "branch 1.7" does that mean a > release is created, or does it mean a branch is created and now 1.7 will > first be tested and all the new features are tested and the bugs ironed out. "Branch" means the 1.7.x branch is forked off t

RE: svn commit: r916286 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn: dav_svn.h mirror.c mod_dav_svn.c

2010-02-26 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Kamesh Jayachandran [mailto:kam...@collab.net] > Sent: vrijdag 26 februari 2010 16:29 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r916286 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn: dav_svn.h mirror.c > mod_dav_svn.c > > On 02/25/2010

Re: Subversion is now an official ASF project!

2010-02-26 Thread Johan Compagner
i was also looking at: http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html and i dont know what it means if you guys say "branch 1.7" does that mean a release is created, or does it mean a branch is created and now 1.7 will first be tested and all the new features are tested and the bugs ironed out. I was

Re: Update required Java version to 5.0?

2010-02-26 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Feb 25, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Hyrum K. Wright > wrote: >> Just going through the svnj source, and I started wondering why we're not >> using generics in our own java packages. Generics were introduced in Java >> 5.0, but turns out that w

Re: Subversion is now an official ASF project!

2010-02-26 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
Please note, though, that that does not reflect any official pronouncement of the Subversion development community. However, a number of the corporate sponsors are working toward making a summer release a reality, and we welcome whatever help folks want to give. Getting the ASF migration out o

Re: svn commit: r916632 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/src/org/tigris/subversion/javahl/SVNClientInterface.java

2010-02-26 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:54 AM, wrote: > Author: lgo > Date: Fri Feb 26 09:54:15 2010 > New Revision: 916632 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916632&view=rev > Log: > javahl: clarify the use of parameter kind of getMergeinfoLog. > > * subversion/javahl/SVNClientInterface.java >  (getMe

Re: Subversion is now an official ASF project!

2010-02-26 Thread James Bailey
Summer :) http://subversion.wandisco.com/component/content/article/1/44.html On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Johan Compagner wrote: > congrats! > do we now get a 1.7 release asap? ;) > I really like the features that where proposed! > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 22:16, Greg Stein wrote: > > > H

Re: Subversion is now an official ASF project!

2010-02-26 Thread Johan Compagner
congrats! do we now get a 1.7 release asap? ;) I really like the features that where proposed! On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 22:16, Greg Stein wrote: > Hi all, > > The ASF Board just voted to approve the graduation of Subversion from > the Incubator. We are now an official project of the Apache Softw