Philip Martin writes:
> ==10949== Invalid read of size 8
> ==10949==at 0x5991011: range_contains (mergeinfo.c:780)
> ==10949==by 0x59913F3: rangelist_intersect_or_remove (mergeinfo.c:912)
> ==10949==by 0x5991903: svn_rangelist_intersect (mergeinfo.c:1043)
> ==10949==by 0x4E76FF3:
s...@apache.org writes:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Fri Jan 22 22:50:42 2010
> New Revision: 902303
> +svn_error_t *
> +svn_wc__call_with_write_lock(svn_wc__with_write_lock_func_t func,
> + void *baton,
> + svn_wc_context_t *wc_ctx,
> +
Philip Martin writes:
> ==13758== Invalid read of size 4
> ==13758==at 0x50FA05B: close_directory (update_editor.c:3166)
> ==13758==by 0x50B6D6E: close_directory (ambient_depth_filter_editor.c:567)
> ==13758==by 0x5541477: close_directory (cancel.c:261)
> ==13758==by 0x5541477: cl
Philip Martin writes:
> s...@apache.org writes:
>
>> Author: stsp
>> Date: Tue Jan 26 15:46:59 2010
>> New Revision: 903284
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903284&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Make svn patch provide notifications about individual hunks.
>> Make the CLI client print them.
>
> I
base_get_info returns information about the BASE tree.
read_info returns information about the WORKING tree, or if a
specified node is not present in WORKING, then info from the BASE
tree.
and recall that BASE == what you checked out from the repository.
WORKING corresponds to added/removed/copie
On Jan 26, 2010, at 4:04 PM, ne...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: neels
> Date: Wed Jan 27 00:04:16 2010
> New Revision: 903507
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903507&view=rev
> Log:
> * tools/dev/unix-build/Makefile.svn: Add missing line ending chars.
I'm curious: why do we need to make
How does
err = svn_wc__db_base_get_info(&status, NULL,
&revision,
&repos_relpath,
&repos_root_url,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> After merging all changes from a branch into the WC, a second attempt of
>> the same merge brings in a different file.
>>
>> Full Details
>>
>> I tried a merge in a clean WC of the branch
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Paul Burba wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:16 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: stylesen
>>> Date: Fri Dec 18 09:16:18 2009
>>> New Revision: 892189
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892189&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>>
s...@apache.org writes:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Tue Jan 26 15:46:59 2010
> New Revision: 903284
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903284&view=rev
> Log:
> Make svn patch provide notifications about individual hunks.
> Make the CLI client print them.
I don't know why yet, but this patch is
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
My take is deprecate the old package names (org.tigris.*), add the new
package name (org.apache.subversion.*), and remove the deprecated
names whenever we go to 2.0.
I'm moderately ambivalent on whether this happens for 1.7 or if can
wait for 1.8.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:23:18AM -0800, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 10:32 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >I've been told some time ago, by long-time unix hackers,
> >that clearning errno is usually not necessary, one of the few
> >exceptions to this rule being the strtol() family of function
On 01/26/2010 10:32 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:02:02AM -0800, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 01/26/2010 09:54 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Tue Jan 26 17:54:14 2010
New Revision: 903342
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903342&view=rev
Log:
* subversion/li
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:02:02AM -0800, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 09:54 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
> >Author: stsp
> >Date: Tue Jan 26 17:54:14 2010
> >New Revision: 903342
> >
> >URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903342&view=rev
> >Log:
> >* subversion/libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c
> >
On 01/26/2010 09:54 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Tue Jan 26 17:54:14 2010
New Revision: 903342
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903342&view=rev
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c
(parse_offset): Clearing errno is never necessary, so don't.
Why are you claiming
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> Maybe the Windows packages need a more prominent location instead of 5 pages
>> down
>> on a more than average screensize.
>> I don't think the Aix packages which are the first on
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Maybe the Windows packages need a more prominent location instead of 5 pages
> down
> on a more than average screensize.
> I don't think the Aix packages which are the first on screen, come anything
> near the
> number of downloads of the
Yeah, I made similar murmurings the other day. In general, it seems we
should favor the OSes for whom Subversion doesn't come via a semi-automated
package management system.
Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org]
>> Sent: maa
On Fri, 2010-01-22, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
> > I've been thinking about how to make entry easy for both newcomers and
> > regulars. Here's the resulting ideas.
> >
> >
> > * On the main page:
> >
> > Let's tell the visitor...
> >
> > - what the project is (and what it i
> -Original Message-
> From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org]
> Sent: maandag 25 januari 2010 23:57
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r903006 - in /subversion/site/publish: getting.html
> packages.html
>
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Mon Jan 25 22:57
Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:57 PM, wrote:
>> Author: cmpilato
>> Date: Mon Jan 25 22:57:07 2010
>> New Revision: 903006
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903006&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Move binary package listing to their own page.
>>
>> * site/publish/packages.html
>>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:57 PM, wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Mon Jan 25 22:57:07 2010
> New Revision: 903006
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903006&view=rev
> Log:
> Move binary package listing to their own page.
>
> * site/publish/packages.html
> Fork from "getting.html", heavil
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:57 AM, wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Mon Jan 25 22:57:07 2010
> New Revision: 903006
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903006&view=rev
> Log:
> Move binary package listing to their own page.
>
> * site/publish/packages.html
> Fork from "getting.html", heavil
Julian Foad wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 at 09:35 -:
> I tested the behaviour and confirmed that the specified pattern had to
> match a whole line, so it would not be a "match anything" pattern.
Thanks for the confirmation. (I checked myself whether it should be
a whole/partial line match, but t
Julian Foad writes:
> Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>> > + # Move new added file to another one and commit.
>> > + second_path = os.path.join(new_path, 'second')
>> > + rav_svn(None, None, [], 'move', first_path, second_path)
>> > + rav_svn(Non
On Fri, 2010-01-15, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 12:22 +, Philip Martin wrote:
> > Julian Foad writes:
> > > I'm unable to run DAV tests this week. I'm getting:
> > >
> > > [[[
> > > (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
> > > 127.0.0.1:3961
> > > no l
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:13, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:59, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 05:12, wrote:
> Author: ivan
> Date: Tue Jan
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:59, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 05:12, wrote:
Author: ivan
Date: Tue Jan 26 10:12:05 2010
New Revision: 903153
URL:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:59, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 05:12, wrote:
>>> Author: ivan
>>> Date: Tue Jan 26 10:12:05 2010
>>> New Revision: 903153
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903153&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 05:12, wrote:
>> Author: ivan
>> Date: Tue Jan 26 10:12:05 2010
>> New Revision: 903153
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903153&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Follow up to r902836.
>>
>> * subversion/libsvn_ra_neon/util
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 05:12, wrote:
> Author: ivan
> Date: Tue Jan 26 10:12:05 2010
> New Revision: 903153
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=903153&view=rev
> Log:
> Follow up to r902836.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_ra_neon/util.c
> (wrapper_reader_cb): Use SVN_RA_NEON__REQ_ERR macro inste
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> What should happen when a username matches multiple lines in an authz
> file? The svnbook states that the first matching line applies:
>
> [groups]
> paint-developers = frank, sally, jane
>
> [paint:/projects/paint]
> jane = r
> @p
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-22, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Julian Foad
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2010-01-11, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> > Your new patch now has a more descriptive error message, that is the
>> > same as the one produc
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:36:13AM +0200, Mark Cammidge wrote:
> Danil Shopyrin wrote:
>
> >> Do they? Perhaps they write them by trial-and-error, testing to see
> >> if they get the behaviour they want. In that case we will break authz
> >> files that work.
> >
> > Agree on this. From our expe
Danil Shopyrin wrote:
>> Do they? Perhaps they write them by trial-and-error, testing to see
>> if they get the behaviour they want. In that case we will break authz
>> files that work.
>
> Agree on this. From our experience, people configure access
> permissions by trial-and-error approach. At
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> julianf...@apache.org wrote on Mon, 25 Jan 2010 at 17:29 -:
> > Fix the expected output of an XFail test added in r902841, so that when the
> > bug is fixed the test will have at least a chance of passing.
> >
> > + rav_svn(None, "Adding.*New|Adding.*first||Committed re
36 matches
Mail list logo
