Re: Email archives

Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Tue, 15 Dec 2009 at 20:30 -0800: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > The one that appears in the individual message links on pages such as > > . > > I haven't figured

Re: Email archives

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > The one that appears in the individual message links on pages such as > . > I haven't figured out how to open a message in a new tab yet thanks to > that thing :)  (

Re: Email archives

Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, 16 Dec 2009 at 03:04 +0200: > . By the way, that page does not render any archive contents when javascript is disabled.

Re: Email archives

[ sorry for the delay responding; I looked for the "ajax/" links last Thursday, but couldn't find them then; and just re-ran into them now ] Julian Foad wrote on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 at 10:18 -: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > When using mail-archives.apache.org I always try to remove "ajax/" from > >

Re: apr pools & memory leaks (revisited, if briefly)

So is this a patch that Google would be willing to donate to APR? C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Some time ago, Ben Collins-Sussman shared with us some of the Google teams' > findings about APR's memory subsystem[1]. In his mail, he says (among other > things) the following: > >Over at Google, we

My vote for r879093 (was r39019) [was: svn commit: r40041 - branches/1.6.x]

On Mon, 2009-12-14, Paul Burba wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Julian Foad > wrote: > > * STATUS: Update my review status on r39019. [...] > > ^/branches/1.6.x-r39109 (The branch is now correctly named "...-r39019" so I've corrected that reference to it.) > >Votes: > > +

Obliterate - BDB trail size [was: svn commit: r890279 - ...]

On Mon, 2009-12-14, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Julian. > > I want to draw your attention to something that you may or may not realize > about designing for the BDB backend. The 'trail' objects are (generally) > representative of Berkeley DB transactions -- that part I'm sure you know. > But you m

Re: [PATCH] v2: Simplify running specific tests on Windows

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis [mailto:gav...@thespidernet.com] >> Sent: dinsdag 15 december 2009 11:07 >> To: Daniel Shahaf; Chris Foote >> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; Bert Huijben >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] v2

Re: apr pools & memory leaks (revisited, if briefly)

On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:16 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > Blair Zajac wrote: >> On 12/14/2009 08:23 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>> Some time ago, Ben Collins-Sussman shared with us some of the Google >>> teams' >>> findings about APR's memory subsystem[1]. In his mail, he says >>> (among other >>> t

Survey about open source projects

Hello, I'm conducting a survey about how open source projects are organized. It's part of the www.openeo.biz community initiative which goal is to research organizational structures of open source projects and business models of companies related to them. It's also a part of my masters thesis :)

RE: [PATCH] v2: Simplify running specific tests on Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis [mailto:gav...@thespidernet.com] > Sent: dinsdag 15 december 2009 11:07 > To: Daniel Shahaf; Chris Foote > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; Bert Huijben > Subject: Re: [PATCH] v2: Simplify running specific tests on Windows > > Ping. This P

Re: [PATCH] Extend 'svn diff URL URL' to 'svn diff URL URL [WC]'

Hi Philip / Julian, Just thought I would send this thread back to you both and see if there was going to be anything further happening with it, or can I drop it from my todo list? Gavin. On 04/12/2009, at 01:00 , Philip Martin wrote: > Julian Foad writes: > >> Philip Martin wrote: >>> Jul

Re: [PATCH] v2: Simplify running specific tests on Windows

Ping. This Patch Submission, originally here; http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2009-12/0086.shtml Has received no comments. Gavin. On 10/12/2009, at 06:10 , Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Chris Foote wrote on Wed, 9 Dec 2009 at 07:04 -0800: >> Hi, >> >> I have incorporated both of Bert and Daniels sugg

Re: apr pools & memory leaks (revisited, if briefly)

Blair Zajac wrote: > On 12/14/2009 08:23 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> Some time ago, Ben Collins-Sussman shared with us some of the Google >> teams' >> findings about APR's memory subsystem[1]. In his mail, he says >> (among other >> things) the following: > > Are there any plans to get this in