[[[
Since the standard Ruby unit test framework has no ability to mark a test as
"XFail," just remove it until it can pass again. Include a request to restore
the test when it should pass again
* subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_client.rb
(SvnClientTest#test_mkdir_p): Comment out
*
Thanks, Hyrum! I've signed off on it, too.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 07:28, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> FWIW, Paul Querna reminded us about this on IRC a couple of days ago, and I
> added a blurb to our section. Justin signed off on it yesterday.
>
> -Hyrum
>
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 3:58 AM, Marvin wr
ah, finally! was trying to tell you about this, but it seemed that I
wasn't being clear enough (or you were being thick :-P )
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:47, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: 2009-12-11 07:47:02-0800
> New Revision: 72
>
> Modified:
> trunk/www/index.html
>
> L
Philip Martin wrote:
> One feature that could be viewed as either an advantage or a
> disadvantage is that obliteration could even be reversible. Removing
> a blacklisted node-rev-id from the blacklist would "unobliterate" it.
>
I think what you describe is more like a repos-level path+revisio
Hi.
I'll send the patch again.
[[[
Fix warning PRJ0009 when building with Visual Studio.
* build/generator/neon.vcproj.ezt
* build/generator/serf.vcproj.ezt
* build/generator/svn_config.vcproj.ezt
* build/generator/svn_locale.vcproj.ezt
* build/generator/templates/vcnet_vcproj.ezt
* build/genera
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 05:25:21PM +0900, masaru tsuchiyama wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I had attached 'BuildLogFile.patch' in the mail.
It didn't arrive here either. Can you try again, please?
Thanks,
Stefan
Hi.
I had attached 'BuildLogFile.patch' in the mail.
Regards.
Masaru.
2009/12/12 Hyrum K. Wright :
> I may be dense, but I don't think there was a patch attached to your original
> mail...
>
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 8:14 PM, masaru tsuchiyama wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> [[[
>> Fix warning PRJ0009 when
7 matches
Mail list logo