On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> This fix does however, produce some odd side effects based on the fact
>> that mergeinfo that differs only by the leading slash is considered
>> the same. So the svn_mergeinfo_(diff|me
Philip Martin wrote:
> julianf...@apache.org writes:
>
> > +svn_error_t *
> > +svn_fs_base__node_rev_dup(const svn_fs_id_t **new_id,
> > + const svn_fs_id_t *old_id,
> > + const char *new_txn_id,
> > + const char *old_txn_i
[Migrated from d...@subversion.tigris.org:
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2420294]
I've filed Subversion issue #3548 to track this:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3548
Thanks, Jeff.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:41
Lorenz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> both dev and u...@subversion.tigris.org list now carry a footer that
> asks to open new threads in @subversion.apache.org.
>
> I think it's time that http://subversion.tigris.org/mailing-lists.html
> is changed to point to the apache.org list.
I've fixed all the s
julianf...@apache.org writes:
> +svn_error_t *
> +svn_fs_base__node_rev_dup(const svn_fs_id_t **new_id,
> + const svn_fs_id_t *old_id,
> + const char *new_txn_id,
> + const char *old_txn_id,
> + tra
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> In doing the recent license audit work[1], one of the big remaining sections
> is packages/, primarily the stuff which is used to build the MSI installer on
> Windows. We have several files which include the a copyright notice
> attribut
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> I'd actually like to see notes/ in the controlled-by-committers area (whether
> a wiki, versioned html or versioned text) and stuff like random links,
> clients and other user-useful stuff in the everyone-can-edit wiki.
Sure - we can se
On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:06 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>> WEBSITE, IN GENERAL
>>
>> I traded some mails with Gavin Baumanis about website design stuff
>> yesterday. We had indeed suffered a miscommunication about who was forging
>>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:06 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> WEBSITE, IN GENERAL
>
> I traded some mails with Gavin Baumanis about website design stuff
> yesterday. We had indeed suffered a miscommunication about who was forging
> ahead on the plan. Gavin is hoping to start submitting patches nex
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> I'd like to do it Real Soon Now. We've got a rudimentary page[1] up on
> the new site explaining the various mailing lists and how to subscribe to
> them. I think we can pull the plug whenever somebody has the guts to
> announce a date and follow through with it.
We've h
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Jon Foster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Paul Burba [ptbu...@gmail.com] wrote:
>> [patch snipped]
>
> If you do this, please consider adding a new capability that can be
> tested in the start-commit hook?
>
> I hope I don't ever get bitten by this bug. But if I do, I'll want
Hi,
Paul Burba [ptbu...@gmail.com] wrote:
> [patch snipped]
If you do this, please consider adding a new capability that can be
tested in the start-commit hook?
I hope I don't ever get bitten by this bug. But if I do, I'll want to
make absolutely sure that all my users have a SVN client that
un
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> This fix does however, produce some odd side effects based on the fact
> that mergeinfo that differs only by the leading slash is considered
> the same. So the svn_mergeinfo_(diff|merge|remove) APIs behave oddly.
> For example, if we checkout
On Dec 10, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
> Resending this to get it back on s.a.o. Bert's reply (which I
> originally replied to all to) jumped it to s.t.o. When are we
> shutting down the s.t.o mailing lists again?
I'd like to do it Real Soon Now. We've got a rudimentary page[1] up on
Resending this to get it back on s.a.o. Bert's reply (which I
originally replied to all to) jumped it to s.t.o. When are we
shutting down the s.t.o mailing lists again?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...
WEBSITE, IN GENERAL
I traded some mails with Gavin Baumanis about website design stuff
yesterday. We had indeed suffered a miscommunication about who was forging
ahead on the plan. Gavin is hoping to start submitting patches next week on
this.
WIKI USAGE
The general sense I got from some membe
On Fri, 2009-12-04, Julian Foad wrote:
> I don't expect anyone to review the whole of this, but any comments
> would be welcome. It's about time I posted what I'm up to. It's not a
> "finished" patch, by any stretch of the imagination, so please don't
> commit it.
I fixed up a load of this and com
On Tue, 2009-12-08, Kannan wrote:
> Make a proper fix to resolve some deprecation warnings using
> `svn_path_url_add_component2()' by canonicalizing the base before
> passing to the above method.
Please split this patch into its two logical changes:
1. Ensure paths are canonical.
2. Upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kannan wrote:
>
> As per discussion in the thread [1], attaching the patch herewith.
>
> Log:
> Make a proper fix to resolve some deprecation warnings using
> `svn_path_url_add_component2()' by canonicalizing the base before
> passing to the above me
Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Julian Foad
> wrote:
> > It is worth considering printing an abbreviated notification.
>
> Given that Paul's proposal calls for adding a new section to the
> notification process to show the paths that mergeinfo is applied to,
> don't you t
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:40:27PM -0500, Paul Burba wrote:
>> > # Instead of silence on the type 2 mergeinfo changes,
>> > # what I am proposing is something like this:
>> >
>> > >svn merge ^^/trunk . -c35049
>> >
Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:18, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >> You also missed http://subversion.apache.org/mail/ --- which is
> [...]
> > Is that just a speculative URL where we might wish to host our own
> > archives one day, or do you know of some actual pla
Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote:
> On 10/12/2009, at 00:11 , Julian Foad wrote:
[...]
> > 1. It's probably a good idea to point out in these emails that logging
> > the patch into the issue tracker does not very much increase the chance
> > of it being applied, it just makes it easier for us to keep tr
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:18, Julian Foad wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>...
>> You also missed http://subversion.apache.org/mail/ --- which is
>> understandable, since it doesn't work yet --- but, AIUI, it *should* start
>> working at some point in the future...
>
> Is that just a speculative UR
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:40:27PM -0500, Paul Burba wrote:
> > # Instead of silence on the type 2 mergeinfo changes,
> > # what I am proposing is something like this:
> >
> > >svn merge ^^/trunk . -c35049
> > --- Merging r35049 into 'subversion\tests':
> > Usubv
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> To answer both of your questions: you missed gmane [1][2], which
> incidentally supports message-id-keyed URLs [3][4].
Ah yes... Gmane is quite nice for browsing message text, but (in my
investigation just now) doesn't handle attachments well enough. Text
attachments just s
26 matches
Mail list logo
