Re: svn commit: r888979 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_repos/load.c tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py

Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:24:20PM -, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: cmpilato >> Date: Wed Dec 9 21:24:19 2009 >> New Revision: 888979 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=888979&view=rev >> Log: >> Fix issue #3547 - 'svnadmin load --parent-dir PATH' can

Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

Hi Julian, On 10/12/2009, at 00:11 , Julian Foad wrote: > Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote: >> Hi Jon, >> >> I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545 >> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545 > > Hi Gavin. It's great that you are keeping these patches under control. I

Re: svn commit: r888979 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_repos/load.c tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:24:20PM -, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: > Author: cmpilato > Date: Wed Dec 9 21:24:19 2009 > New Revision: 888979 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=888979&view=rev > Log: > Fix issue #3547 - 'svnadmin load --parent-dir PATH' can destroy mergeinfo > + /*

Re: [RFC] Add notifications when mergeinfo is set to describe a merge

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:40:27PM -0500, Paul Burba wrote: > # Instead of silence on the type 2 mergeinfo changes, > # what I am proposing is something like this: > > >svn merge ^^/trunk . -c35049 > --- Merging r35049 into 'subversion\tests': > Usubversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\main.py

[RFC] Add notifications when mergeinfo is set to describe a merge

The svn merge subcommand can create local svn:mergeinfo modifications in two basic ways: 1) The application of a diff -- If the merge sources have differences in the svn:mergeinfo property, then they are applied just like any other versioned property. 2) Describing the merge performed -- A merge

Re: HEADS UP: Damaged mergeinfo in our history; likely pain in our future.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > While trying to figure out why my attempt at performing a catch-up merge of > the 'issue-3242-dev' branch with ^/subversion/trunk was conflicting like > crazy for me today, I discovered something unhappy: > >   $ svn pget svn:mergeinfo . >

HEADS UP: Damaged mergeinfo in our history; likely pain in our future.

While trying to figure out why my attempt at performing a catch-up merge of the 'issue-3242-dev' branch with ^/subversion/trunk was conflicting like crazy for me today, I discovered something unhappy: $ svn pget svn:mergeinfo . subversion/branches/1.5.x-r30215:870312 subversion/branches/b

RE: Do we need to distribute packages/ ?

> -Original Message- > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] > Sent: Thursday, 10 December 2009 2:08 AM > To: 'Hyrum K. Wright'; 'Stefan Sperling' > Cc: 'Subversion Development'; 'Troy Simpson' > Subject: RE: Do we need to distribute packages/ ? > > > -Original Message- > > Fr

Re: Do we need to distribute packages/ ?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 06:13:37AM +1000, Troy Simpson wrote: > Please be aware before modifying the WiX package > too much that I have made a number of changes that are currently on my local > machine that need to be committed. You could also send a diff and we'll commit it for you if that helps.

Re: Do we need to distribute packages/ ?

On Dec 9, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Troy Simpson wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] >> Sent: Thursday, 10 December 2009 2:08 AM >> To: 'Hyrum K. Wright'; 'Stefan Sperling' >> Cc: 'Subversion Development'; 'Troy Simpson' >> Subject: RE: Do we need to distrib

Re: [PATCH] v2: Simplify running specific tests on Windows

Chris Foote wrote on Wed, 9 Dec 2009 at 07:04 -0800: > Hi, > > I have incorporated both of Bert and Daniels suggestions into the patch > (attached). > Thanks for implementing the suggestions. I've no time to review this myself right now, unfortunately. But hopefully someone else can do that.

Re: Email archives

Julian Foad wrote on Wed, 9 Dec 2009 at 13:10 -: > APACHE ARCHIVE > > I went looking for the new d...@s.apache.org archive, and found it at > . Although it When using mail-archives.apache.org I always try to remove "ajax/" from the URL

Re: Email archives

To answer both of your questions: you missed gmane [1][2], which incidentally supports message-id-keyed URLs [3][4]. You also missed http://subversion.apache.org/mail/ --- which is understandable, since it doesn't work yet --- but, AIUI, it *should* start working at some point in the future...

Re: svn commit: r888863 - in /subversion/branches/obliterate-like-deltify: ./ subversion/include/ subversion/libsvn_fs/ subversion/libsvn_fs_base/ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/ subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/

Blair Zajac writes: >> +/** Obliterate the text associated with @revision of @a path in @a fs, >> + * where @a path must be a file. The text is replaced with the text >> + * of the previous version of the file. > > I haven't been following the obliterate discussion closely, but how > does this w

Re: svn commit: r888863 - in /subversion/branches/obliterate-like-deltify: ./ subversion/include/ subversion/libsvn_fs/ subversion/libsvn_fs_base/ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/ subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/

On Dec 9, 2009, at 8:33 AM, phi...@apache.org wrote: > Author: philip > Date: Wed Dec 9 16:33:28 2009 > New Revision: 63 > > > Modified: > subversion/branches/obliterate-like-deltify/subversion/include/svn_fs.h > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/obliterate-like-de

Re: Email archives

On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:05 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:10:54PM +, Julian Foad wrote: > > MARC ARCHIVE > > > > MARC looks OK. Completeness: It has > > Subversion archives up to a year ago, and could probably be updated. > > Wo

RE: Do we need to distribute packages/ ?

> -Original Message- > From: Hyrum K. Wright [mailto:hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu] > Sent: woensdag 9 december 2009 17:00 > To: Stefan Sperling > Cc: Subversion Development; Troy Simpson > Subject: Re: Do we need to distribute packages/ ? > > >> Any advice on this topic would be apprecia

Re: Do we need to distribute packages/ ?

On Dec 9, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:11:19AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> In doing the recent license audit work[1], one of the big remaining >> sections is packages/, primarily the stuff which is used to build the >> MSI installer on Windows. We ha

Re: Do we need to distribute packages/ ?

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:11:19AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > In doing the recent license audit work[1], one of the big remaining > sections is packages/, primarily the stuff which is used to build the > MSI installer on Windows. We have several files which include the a > copyright notice at

Do we need to distribute packages/ ?

In doing the recent license audit work[1], one of the big remaining sections is packages/, primarily the stuff which is used to build the MSI installer on Windows. We have several files which include the a copyright notice attributing them to Microsoft, and upon further research, they look to b

[PATCH] v2: Simplify running specific tests on Windows

Hi, I have incorporated both of Bert and Daniels suggestions into the patch (attached). This version of the patch adds the ability to specify one or more tests (and test numbers) to run on Windows. The --test option takes the name of the test executable (with or without the "-test.exe"/"_test

Re: [PATCH] Simplify running specific tests on Windows

- "Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis" wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Just following up your patch submission and checking if you were going > to be following-up on the suggestions provided by Bert and Daniel? > > Gavin. > Hi Gavin, I'll be posting an updated patch shortly with both of the suggestions. Rega

Re: Email archives

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:10:54PM +, Julian Foad wrote: > MARC ARCHIVE > > MARC looks OK. Completeness: It has > Subversion archives up to a year ago, and could probably be updated. > Worthy of further investigation. I like marc.info a lot. The UI is simp

Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote: > Hi Jon, > > I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545 > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545 Hi Gavin. It's great that you are keeping these patches under control. I have a couple of suggestions: 1. It's probably a good idea to poin

Email archives

I miss the archive URLs that we had on the bottom of d...@s.tigris.o emails. They were very useful when logging something in the issue tracker or digging up the history of a thread. I went looking in the archives anyway, including some linked from <>, and found spiders and broken windows... TIGR

Re: [PATCH] Simplify running specific tests on Windows

Hi Chris, Just following up your patch submission and checking if you were going to be following-up on the suggestions provided by Bert and Daniel? Gavin. On 05/12/2009, at 01:43 , Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Chris Foote wrote on Thu, 3 Dec 2009 at 16:16 -0800: >> Hi, >> >> This patch adds the a

Re: [PATCH] Fix race condition in svnsync locking

Hi Jon, I have logged your patch into the issue tracker, 3546; http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3546 Gavin On 28/11/2009, at 06:53 , Jon Foster wrote: > Hi, > > This fixes the race condition where two svnsync processes can lock > the repository at the same time (as noticed

Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

Hi Jon, I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545 http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545 Gavin On 28/11/2009, at 03:32 , Jon Foster wrote: > [Very sorry, my mailserver appears to be dropping attachments > and mangling inline patches by word-wrapping them. > Try