Github user jarcec commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/sqoop/pull/20
Hi @git-rbanerjee ,
Sqoop project currently does not accept pull requests. You will need to
generate patch and upload it to the JIRA as per our instructions here:
https://cwiki.apache.org
not any production deliverable, we can always
iterate if that will turn out to be a problem in the future.
Jarcec
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 8:19 AM, Boglarka Egyed wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to start a discussion about including the SQLServer Manual
> tests to the 3rd p
. Introducing it will be iterative process anyway, so the third
party tests can be added whenever the infrastructure will be ready for them.
Jarcec
> On Apr 7, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Attila Szabó wrote:
>
> Hey Anna,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply!
>
> I'm not sure i
meetup justice. As a result last meetup we
organized through this page was more then three years ago (October 2014). Hence
I wonder if it’s still useful to keep it around - and I’m curious what the
community think at large? Do you see value in resurrecting the page?
Jarcec
Github user jarcec commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/sqoop/pull/11#issuecomment-164666219
Sqoop project do not accept pull requests at this point. Would you mind
attaching the patch the JIRA itself?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Strong +1!
Good luck Hari and Mengwei with the release!
Jarcec
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 07:40:34PM -0500, abhijeet gaikwad wrote:
> +1 for both.
>
> Best,
> Abhijeet
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganat...@hortonworks.com> wrote
Hi Venkat,
thank you very much for offering doing the HCatalog presentation! We can
definitely do a webex session to join you or anyone else remotely, so I've
updated the meetup details and added you as a speaker!
Jarcec
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 04:44:12PM -0700, Venkat Ranganathan wrote:
ls and will send the call
details shortly before the meetup.
Raghav, Abe and Venkat - you do not need to drop me the email :-)
Jarcec
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 03:19:30PM -0700, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> I as well would like to attend remotely if possible.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013
Hi Anshuman,
I'm personally not aware of any mongoDB connector for Sqoop. As mongoDB is not
exposing JDBC interface, the default Generic JDBC Connector won't work either.
Jarcec
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:30:57PM +, Anshuman Saini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to kn
o get them committed in time.
Jarcec
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:21:18AM -0400, Mengwei Ding wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hope you guys are doing well.
>
> We are starting the process of new release Sqoop 1.99.3. However, there are
> still several tickets pending to be committed. Sorry to as
+1 as well
Jarcec
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 09:52:50PM -0700, Hari Shreedharan wrote:
> Agreed. +1 as well.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganat...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Mengwei
> >
> >
> > These are
Please go ahead!
Jarcec
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 01:43:19PM -0400, Mengwei Ding wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to make a branch for the new release from current head of the
> trunk. If you feel uncomfortable about this, please let me know. Thank you.
>
> Best,
> Mengwe
Awesome, thank you for driving the release!
Jarcec
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:12:35AM -0400, Mengwei Ding wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just created new release branch for upcoming 1.99.3 release. Please
> continue committing to main Sqoop 2 branch "sqoop2" as usual, I&
Sqoop has been selected as second in Bossie Awards 2013:
http://www.infoworld.com/slideshow/119424/bossie-awards-2013-the-best-open-source-big-data-tools-226730#slide3
Let me thank you to entire Sqoop dev team for awesome work and our users for
helping us create great software!
Jarcec
morrow, but I wanted to give other committers ability
to take a look. Unfortunately only committers can have access to the
unpublished blog posts, so other contributors will have to wait for publication
to tomorrow.
Jarcec
Links:
1:
http://blogs.apache.org/roller-ui/authoring/entryEdit.rol?
.2 to 1.99.3,
I was wondering if there is any chance to get into 1.99.3?
Jarcec
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Will take a look on the patch shortly.
Jarcec
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0700, Hari Shreedharan wrote:
> +1 if we can commit this in time.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
>
> On Thursday, September 26, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
>
> > http
Thank you Mengwei!
Jarcec
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 08:54:37PM -0700, Mengwei Ding wrote:
> +1. Let's do it.
>
> Mengwei
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>
> > Hi Mengwei,
> > thank you very much for working on the 1.99.3 r
bex session for the
meetup, so we will be able to dial you in! You won't be able to enjoy the food
and beverages though.
Jarcec
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
And we are looking forward to see you!
Jarcec
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 08:03:39PM -0400, Chalcy wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am planning to attend this year.
>
> Looking forward to seeing you all,
> Chalcy
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho w
java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/jdbc/GenericJdbcConnector.java#L38
Jarcec
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:31:22PM +0530, Kunal Sachdeva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> *Subject: Want to invoke custom extractor class run method for printing
> data- MySql table's columns values data in Import job*.
>
Hi Yandex,
what Sqoop version are you using?
Would you mind sharing with us failed Map task log? It usually contains also
the chained exceptions with more information about the failure.
Jarcec
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:44:34PM +0700, Yandex Mail wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I
included in the binary
archives
* Verified top level files
* Tried simple import job on Hadoop 1.0.1 (BigTop 0.3)
* Tried simple import job on Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha (BigTop 0.6)
Jarcec
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 08:43:44PM -0400, Mengwei Ding wrote:
> This is the third cut of Sqoop 2 branch, version 1.9
Hi Kunal,
the extractor is connector driver rather then user given. As a result you can't
specify which extractor will be used as this is specified by the connector. You
will have to create your own connector if you need to call custom extractor.
Jarcec
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 03:14:16PM
Hi Ivan,
the ORA-01555 is suggesting that the UNDO log is too small. Are you by any
chance also running some queries (SELECT?) against this table? What is the log
configured size?
Jarcec
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:03:56AM +0700, Skvortsov Ivan wrote:
> Hi Jarcec,
>
> My nam
't disturb your usual workflow!
Happy Sqoop development!
Jarcec
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Just a reminding that the New York Sqoop meetup is next Monday! See you all
there!
Jarcec
P.S. I've sent a webex invite. If you are planning to join remotely and you did
not get an invite, please do let me know.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:39:07AM -0700, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>
The meetup is on fourth floor in a meeting room called Hudson. I would suggest
to take the elevators from the lobby directly to the fourth floor and then the
room are just next to the elevators.
Jarcec
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:52:28PM -0700, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> Just a reminding t
Thank you very much to our speakers, Venkat, Abe and Masatake for giving great
talks on our last User meetup. I hope that everyone had a great time! The slide
decks are available on our wiki [1].
Jarcec
Links:
1: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Home
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at
Awesome, thank you for driving the release Mengwei. Excellent job!
Jarcec
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 06:31:24PM -0500, Mengwei Ding wrote:
> The Apache Sqoop team is pleased to announce the release of Sqoop 1.99.3.
>
> This is the third cut of Sqoop2 branch. Major step forward of th
--map-column-java $columnName=String
Jarcec
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:15:50PM -0500, Rahul Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are trying to use Sqoop for importing data from Oracle. The table has
> CLOB as one of its column type which contains newline characters at many
> place
Hi David,
I'm super excited to see this. I've personally used the OraOop connector
several times and I'm recommending it to every user that is having difficulties
or performance issues with the built-in one. I'm definitely in favour of the
proposal!
Jarcec
On Wed, Jan 22
Wow, that is an overwhelming support, thank everyone who has expressed the
feedback. Considering that this is a huge contribution, I think that we should
also have a formal VOTE thread that will server as a record of our decision.
Would you mind starting it, David?
Jarcec
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014
+1!
Jarcec
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 04:06:10PM -0800, Kathleen Ting wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks David and Jarcec! The OraOop Connector will be a momentous
> addition to the Apache Sqoop codebase.
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Hari Shreedharan
> wrote:
> > +1.
>
at we have the legal part covered.
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 09:21:13PM -0800, Venkat Ranganathan wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks
> Venkat
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Abhijeet Gaikwad
> wrote:
>
Hi David,
it seems that there were no objections with using the software grant to
contribute the OraOop. Would you mind following up with your employer to fill
and submit the agreement? The procedure is documented at [1].
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants
On Sat, Jan 25
mailing list, helping people overcome troubles
that they encounter on their adventure with Sqoop. And as if that wouldn't be
enough, he drove our latest Sqoop 2 release 1.99.3!
Please join me in the congratulations!
Jarcec
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Sqoopers,
I'm wondering if anyone is going to ApacheCon [1] this year? I'm thinking about
doing Sqoop meetup if there will be enough attendees!
We're going to present with Abe Sqoop 1 tutorial [2] and deep dive into Sqoop 2
[3]. Don't hesitate and stop by!
Ja
what
all jars you will need.
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://sqoop.apache.org/docs/1.99.3/ClientAPI.html
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 03:01:51PM +, Ajay Chitre -X (achitre - PERSISTENT
SYSTEMS INC at Cisco) wrote:
> If you're using Maven use a dependency such as this:
>
>
> org
tor? The documentation says that a partitioner
It's up to the connector. The partitioner's job is to partition the job into up
to X partitions that each will be executed by single Extractor.
Jarcec
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:11:57PM +0100, Rob Vesse wrote:
> Hey all
>
> I&#
Seems like a good plan to me!
Jarcec
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 08:27:11AM -0700, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1 to --direct
>
> Which leads right back to the documentation.
>
> Currently the Netezza direct connector is documented in section 24 - Notes
> for Specific Connectors.
>
mentor one community
volunteer. I'm more then happy to sign up for the mentorship.
Jarcec
Links:
1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1341?jql=project%20%3D%20SQOOP%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.4.5%22%20and%20status%20%3D%20resolved
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
what you can help with :-) I'm sure that there will be ton of
opportunities!
Jarcec
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:38:32AM +, Martin, Nick wrote:
> Housekeeping-wise...hoping the new release will have ample documentation
> around the OraOop piece. That in the works?
>
> I&#x
he patches to come in.
Jarcec
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:03:37AM -0700, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1 for 1.4.5 release
> +1 for Abe as release manager
> and +1 for Venkat getting his patches in (especially if this includes the
> Oracle Wallet patch)
>
> Gwen
>
>
> On Wed,
2 release nor other
bigger features, I would be personally fine with destabilizing the sqoop2
branch and simply do all the drastic changes there.
Jarcec
On Jul 10, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Good idea to work on drastic changes in a separate branch.
>
> Gwen
>
>
+ 0 from my side :-)
Jarcec
On Jul 14, 2014, at 2:32 PM, Hari Shreedharan wrote:
> +1 for me :)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
>
>> We would likely comment out all the tests, which could bring
Done:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/SQOOP-1367
jarcec
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:37 AM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> Thanks guys! Are there any committers that want to create the branch for
> me? I suppose we could use its Jira number (SQOOP-1367)
Hi Ravi,
we’re not publishing the “test” artifacts because we have to use the
“classifier” field for hadoop version - it’s a maven limitation. Please do
create JIRA, we’re working on 1.4.5 release so perhaps we can find some way how
to publish the artifacts.
Jarcec
On Jul 18, 2014, at 8:09 AM
Seems reasonable to me, thank you for driving the release Abe!
Jarcec
On Jul 18, 2014, at 10:40 AM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I haven't seen a -1 on this suggestion. So let's create a release branch
> come Wednesday July 23rd.
>
> -Abe
>
>
I believe that you’re correct.
Jarcec
On Jul 21, 2014, at 8:41 PM, FF Chen wrote:
> Could someone help to answer this? Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:53 PM, FF Chen wrote:
> Here is what I found in /org/apache/sqoop/hive/HiveImport.java:
> sqoop is getting
I think that both are in. Do let me know when and from which commit you want me
to branch Abe :-)
Jarcec
On Jul 23, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> As soon as the Ivy and Avro version changes are in, let's start the
> branching process?
>
&
Too late, I’m already in process of branching :-) But that’s fine - we can
always cherry-pick whatever will be necessary.
Jarcec
On Jul 23, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> Ah actually, it seems there is a broken OraOop test case. Let me see what's
> going on there befor
Release branch is alive here:
https://github.com/apache/sqoop/tree/branch-1.4.5
Trunk has been switched to version 1.4.6-SNAPSHOT.
Jarcec
On Jul 23, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> Too late, I’m already in process of branching :-) But that’s fine - we can
> always cherr
I’m obviously biased, but +1 to Pelican.
Jarcec
On Jul 24, 2014, at 7:06 PM, Martin, Nick wrote:
> +1 Pelican
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gwen Shapira [mailto:gshap...@cloudera.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 9:51 PM
> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> Subject:
confident that in not too distant future, we will have Sqoop 2 that will
offer the comparable capability and features as Sqoop 1.
I don’t think that the code name is the only idea that will decrease the
immediate user confusion and hence I’m happy to hear others thoughts!
Jarcec
On Jul 26
You should definitely talk about the recent refactoring that you’re doing on
Sqoop 2 side Abe!
Jarcec
On Jul 28, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> It looks like we've found a venue the night of 10/15! The Huffington Post
> has been kind enough to hos
I don’t have any other suggestion either, so let’s discuss which one would
people prefer?
I’m personally in favor of proposal 1).
Jarcec
On Jul 28, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Thanks for the great summary. I don't have additional suggestions.
>
> Gwen
>
>
contributions at [1]. Welcome to the family Abe!
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://s.apache.org/W9m
+1
* Verified checksums and signatures
* Run tests
* Verified top level files
Jarcec
On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> This is the fourth release for Apache Sqoop 1, version 1.4.5. Please
> cast your vote by 08/08/2014!
>
> The list of fixed issues:
>
>
on contributing it back to the
project. Other then that he did several fixes here and there by for example
improving our HBase support. List of all his contributions is at [1]. Welcome
to the family David!
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://s.apache.org/FLio
support for HCatalog/Hive 0.13 that added
support for lot of new data types that has been requested by our users. You can
see quite impressive list of all his 68 contributions at [1]. Well deserved
Venkat!
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://s.apache.org/C85
.
Jarcec
On Aug 7, 2014, at 8:30 AM, Gaetano Fabiano wrote:
> Hi All,
> this is my first post on this mailing list I hope to stay here for long
> time. I saw the project and I love it.
> But recently I'm going crazy about issues.
> I'm writing a java client to use Apache Sqoop,
> One minor thing I noticed - Sqoop 1.4.4 doesn't have .gitignore and
> .gitattributes files in the archive - but 1.4.5 does. I'm not sure if this is
> intentional or not?
Intentional:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1268
Jarcec
On Aug 7, 2014, at 8:00 PM,
FYI: I’ve pinged infra team to create new review board repository for our
SQOOP-1367 branch.
Jarcec
Go for it!
Jarcec
On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:50 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Over a week with no additional objections!
>
> I believe there is no need for a vote in this case, so I'll go ahead
> and open Jira tickets and submit patches for the changes we agreed on:
>
> -
Technically the answer is yes we can change them, but I would suggest not to as
the docs should be immutable after release.
They live in the repository, so we should make similar changes in the “source
code”.
Jarcec
On Aug 20, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Quick Q:
> Is t
Hi sir,
did you seen our Connector developer guide for Sqoop 2 [1]? We are currently
very extensively refactoring the connector interface via SQOOP-1367, so please
note that you will have to do some changes for the next release.
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://sqoop.apache.org/docs/1.99.3
ensure that it will be always used. I’ve seen several project using
maven-shade-plugin to do exactly that. The downside is that your binary will
get considerably bigger (as shaded libraries will get copied to your own jar).
Jarcec
On Sep 12, 2014, at 2:24 AM, Matt Ingenthron wrote:
> Hi
key-value pairs - that is how the format is
defined. However this doesn’t suite Sqoop as we consider entire row as “key”
and hence we’re not using the “value” field - and that is the null that you’re
observing.
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://sqoop.apache.org/mail-lists.html
On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:01 PM
-text) you will get
generic output that will include the value field and hence will show a null
string. Simply don’t use the “value” field in your application and you will be
good to go!
Jarcec
On Sep 23, 2014, at 11:00 PM, shakun grover wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Whenever I do a Sqo
Management breathing behind our back, so we can easily
edit/change the roadmap if something came up.
Jarcec
On Oct 2, 2014, at 7:16 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> Hehe thanks for your thoughts Veena.
>
> I don't see why we can't add Spark to 1.99.5 roadmap. As long as no one
Thank you Abe!
Jarcec
On Oct 9, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop+2+Roadmaps
>
> Thanks guys for your support!
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
>
>> That works... doing so n
names that
Veena is driving, that justify a release.
Jarcec
On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Venkat Ranganathan
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Gwen Shapira
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Abraham Elmahrek
>&
We’ve lastly released Sqoop 2 last year, so I think that it’s definitely time
for a new release.
+1 on the release and +1 on Gwen to be the release manager.
Jarcec
> On Oct 21, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> +1 for doing a new release.
>
> I'll be happy to vo
.
Just to be sure - I’m not suggesting to remove the two weeks heads up period, I
want to keep it. I’m just suggesting to decouple the “branching” and “heads
up”, so that we can continue the fast pace of introducing changes without
affecting the ongoing release work.
Jarcec
Link:
1:
https
I’m wondering what is the issue with different commit other (and different set
of commits) between sqoop2 and branch-1.99.4 branches?
Jarcec
> On Nov 3, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Since sqoop2 branch and branch-1.99.4 may be out of order. I wa
I think that it’s acceptable that the release branch-1.99.4 and sqoop2 will
have different commits and in different order - we won’t be merging them them
in the future, so as long as sqoop2 is strict super set of branch-1.99.4, we
should be good to go :)
Jarcec
> On Nov 3, 2014, at 2:41
That seems like a very nasty regression that we definitely should fix.
Jarcec
> On Nov 4, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> I'd like to fix that, yes.
>
> Do you have an estimated ETA?
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
>
>
Our intermediate data format [1] specifies that the date should be in the
format with space (and without the “T” as is expected, so I’ve +1 the patch
and committed it.
Jarcec
Links:
1:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop2+Intermediate+representation
> On Nov 4, 2014,
Our intermediate data format [1] specifies that the date should be in the
format with space (and without the “T” as is expected, so I’ve +1 the patch
and committed it.
Jarcec
Links:
1:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop2+Intermediate+representation
> On Nov 4, 2014,
Hi Sudeep,
I’m excited to see you taking on SQOOP-2873. Please do not hesitate and submit
a patch, we’ll be happy to review it!
Jarcec
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 2:59 AM, Sudeep Jaiswal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have implemented the support for multiple columns in incremental import.
&g
option to build faster. Could you
open a JIRA and attach the patch there? Sadly our mailing lists doesn’t allow
attachments so the patch did not made it to list.
Jarcec
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 4:26 AM, Attila Szabo wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> First let me introduce myself to the communit
+dev@sqoop
I see plenty of new features available in the head of sqoop2 branch, so perhaps
it would make sense to do a release?
Jarcec
> On May 10, 2016, at 12:33 AM, ssvinarc...@cybervisiontech.com wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Could somebody say when will be released Sqoop 1.99
I like the proposal and I would second it.
> 1. Deprecate support for Hadoop 1 and older versions of HBase (only
> support 1.0+) and Hive (only support 1.0+)
I would even suggest to be more extreme and rather then “deprecating” I would
directly remove that support.
Jarcec
>
Hey Attila,
is there a JIRA associated with it?
Jarcec
> On May 18, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Attila Szabo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think in my previous mail I've an invalid review ticket link.
>
> The proper one is this:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47110/diff/1#in
Any volunteers to drive that release? :)
Jarcec
> On May 18, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Abraham Fine wrote:
>
> I agree.
>
>
>> On May 18, 2016, at 11:24, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>>
>> +dev@sqoop
>>
>> I see plenty of new features available in the h
There doesn’t seems to be any objections, so let’s do the release. Thanks for
volunteering to be the release manager Abe!
I’m happy to be a release mentor since this will be your first release if that
is fine with you.
Jarcec
> On May 20, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Abraham Fine wrote:
>
>
are you doing to get the exception? Also
getting the full stack trace will be extremely helpful.
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://sqoop.apache.org/mail-lists.html
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 1:31 PM, John wrote:
>
> Jarek,
>
> I continue to poke at the Sqoop project occasionally. I have recen
help
you out :) You will need to join the mailing list if you want to respond to any
email, instructions are here:
http://sqoop.apache.org/mail-lists.html
Jarcec
> On Jul 4, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Rabin Banerjee
> wrote:
>
> SQOOP-2930 & SQOOP-1933
> PR::
> https://github.co
Hi Julio,
it’s better to send such questions to dev@sqoop mailing list as the whole
community can chime in and help you out. I’ve added the list now, however if
you will need to follow up, you will need to sign up per our instructions at
[1].
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://sqoop.apache.org/mail
jar
that should’t be needed right?
Otherwise I’ve build the source release and run tests there and validated both
binary and source tarballs top level files (license, notice, …) and those all
look good.
Jarcec
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Abraham Fine wrote:
>
> This is Sqoop 2
Thank you Abe!
Jarcec
> On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Abraham Fine wrote:
>
> Good catch Jarcec.
>
> I seem to have left some stuff in there that i failed to notice due to having
> them in my gitignore.
>
> I will cut another release that does not include all this e
+1
Thanks for building second RC Abe!
Jarcec
> On Jul 19, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Abraham Fine wrote:
>
> This is Sqoop 2, version 1.99.7, release candidate 1. The main purpose of
> this release is to increasing the stability of the generic-jdbc-connector and
> the hdfs-connector
Congratulations Abe, well deserved!
Jarcec
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 11:00 PM, Kathleen Ting wrote:
>
> On behalf of the Apache Sqoop PMC, I am stoked to welcome Abe Fine as
> a new Sqoop PMC Member. Please join me in congratulating him.
>
> On top of his code contributions[1], A
On behalf of the Apache Sqoop PMC, I am excited to welcome Boglarka Egyed as
new Sqoop PMC Member. Please join me in congratulating her!
Jarcec
+1 from my end too
Jarcec
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 11:26 PM Boglarka Egyed wrote:
> Hi Venkat,
>
> Thanks for initiating the community survey and this vote thread.
>
> Based on the activity in the last couple of years, here is my +1
>
> Regards,
> Bogi
>
> Venkat
Hi Mohan,
I’m adding Sqoop dev mailing list, please subscribe to the list in order to see
responses on this email thread.
Jarcec
> On Nov 16, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Mohan Goyal wrote:
>
> Dear Jarek,
>
> First of all my appology reaching out to you directly. And please allow me
+1
* Verified checksums and signature files
* Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
* Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
* Run tests
* Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
Jarcec
> On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> Developers, C
I think that the “—no-prefix” is there from our SVN times. We are using prefix
since we’ve moved to git. I would simply update the wiki.
Jarcec
> On Nov 18, 2014, at 8:39 PM, Venkat Ranganathan
> wrote:
>
> I have seen all the patches almost always created with the prefix (th
What’s your wiki user name David?
Jarcec
> On Nov 18, 2014, at 9:19 PM, David Robson
> wrote:
>
> I don't have access to edit the wiki - can someone either add me to it or
> update this page?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jarek Jarcec Cecho [mailto:j
1 - 100 of 3922 matches
Mail list logo
