+1
On Thu, 19 Sept 2024, 01:05 Gengliang Wang, wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:47 PM Xiao Li wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 18:22 Yuming Wang wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 6:07 PM Cheng Pan wrote:
>>>
+1 (non-binding)
I checked
-
+1
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025, 21:21 Max Gekk, wrote:
> Hi Spark devs,
>
> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2].
> The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type
> should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL
> standard.