[VOTE] Release Apache Spark K8s Operator 0.2.0 (RC1)

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark K8s Operator 0.2.0. This vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark K8s Operator 0.2.0 [ ] -1 Do not release this packa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark K8s Operator 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1 I checked the shasum and signature and tested with K8s v1.32. Thanks, Dongjoon On 2025/05/17 15:19:58 Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark K8s > Operator 0.2.0. This vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a > majority +1 PMC votes a

[VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.2.0 (RC1)

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.2.0. This vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.2.0 [ ] -1 Do not re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1. I checked the checksum and signature and tested with Spark 4.0.0 RC6. Thanks, Dongjoon. On 2025/05/17 12:39:39 Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark Connect > Swift Client 0.2.0. This vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a > major

Re: [DISCUSS][SPARK SQL] SPARK-51710: Using Dataframe.dropDuplicates with an empty array as argument behaves "unexpectedly"

Yes, sure it makes a lot of sense to be able to switch back between the two different behaviors. On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:48 AM Wenchen Fan wrote: > So you are basically saying df.dropDuplicates(Seq.empty) should be the > same as df.dropDuplicates(all_columns). I think this is a reasonable > c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1 Checked checksum, signature and ran some examples. On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 4:30 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > +1. > > I checked the checksum and signature and tested with Spark 4.0.0 RC6. > > Thanks, > Dongjoon. > > On 2025/05/17 12:39:39 Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > Please vote on releasing the fol

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0 (RC6)

Thanks all! The two reported issues are both fixed, and I'll cut the next RC on my Monday next week. On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 4:17 AM Jungtaek Lim wrote: > UPDATE: The fix is merged. @Adam Binford if you could > help verifying this in latest branch-4.0, that would be great. Thanks for > reportin

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0 (RC6)

Yep looks good to me. Adam Binford On Sat, May 17, 2025, 2:59 AM Wenchen Fan wrote: > Thanks all! The two reported issues are both fixed, and I'll cut the next > RC on my Monday next week. > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 4:17 AM Jungtaek Lim > wrote: > >> UPDATE: The fix is merged. @Adam Binford

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark K8s Operator 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1 Thanks Dongjoon. On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 8:22 AM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark K8s Operator > 0.2.0. This vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority +1 > PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. > > [ ] +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1 Thanks Dongjoon! On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:10 PM Peter Toth wrote: > +1 > > Checked checksum, signature and ran some examples. > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 4:30 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > >> +1. >> >> I checked the checksum and signature and tested with Spark 4.0.0 RC6. >> >> Thanks, >> Dongj

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark K8s Operator 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1 Thanks Dongjoon! On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 2:44 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > +1 > > Thanks Dongjoon. > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 8:22 AM Dongjoon Hyun > wrote: > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark K8s > Operator 0.2.0. This vote is open for the next 72 hours and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1 (non-binding)On May 17, 2025, at 16:28, Hyukjin Kwon wrote:+1On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 07:47, L. C. Hsieh wrote:+1 Thanks Dongjoon. On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 5:40 AM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Sp

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark K8s Operator 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1 Thanks Dongjoon! *Zhou JIANG* On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 08:30 Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > +1 > > I checked the shasum and signature and tested with K8s v1.32. > > Thanks, > Dongjoon > > On 2025/05/17 15:19:58 Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1 Thanks Dongjoon. On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 5:40 AM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark Connect > Swift Client 0.2.0. This vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a > majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark K8s Operator 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1 On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 07:37, huaxin gao wrote: > +1 > Thanks Dongjoon! > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 2:44 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks Dongjoon. >> >> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 8:22 AM Dongjoon Hyun >> wrote: >> > >> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Sp

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.2.0 (RC1)

+1 On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 07:47, L. C. Hsieh wrote: > +1 > > Thanks Dongjoon. > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 5:40 AM Dongjoon Hyun > wrote: > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark Connect > Swift Client 0.2.0. This vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a