Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Cheng Pan > On Apr 9, 2025, at 22:22, Sandy Ryza wrote: > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move to > a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: * > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f8

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (binding) On 2025/04/10 02:20:02 Cheng Pan wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Cheng Pan > > > > > On Apr 9, 2025, at 22:22, Sandy Ryza wrote: > > > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move > > to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pip

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (binding) Kent Yao 于2025年4月10日周四 12:00写道： > > +1 (binding) > > Kent Yao > > Yang Jie 于2025年4月10日周四 10:27写道： >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On 2025/04/10 02:20:02 Cheng Pan wrote: >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Cheng Pan >> > >> > >> > >> > > On Apr 9, 2025, at 22:22, Sandy Ryza wrote

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:43 PM Denny Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:03 Chao Sun wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 10:55 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:22 AM Sandy Ryza wrote: >>> > >>> > We started to get some votes o

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:22 AM Sandy Ryza wrote: > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move to > a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: * > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f829ps0bog41fjoqc45xk7m574ly > *SPIP

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau Fight Health Insurance: https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/ Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 YouTube Live Streams: https://www.yo

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1!!! On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 6:03 AM Jungtaek Lim wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:22 PM Sandy Ryza wrote: > >> We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to >> move to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. >> >> *Discussion t

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (non-binding) - Anton ср, 9 квіт. 2025 р. о 15:01 Jungtaek Lim пише: > Btw who is going to shephard this SPIP? I don't see this in the > doc/JIRA/discussion thread. I understand there are PMC members in the > author list, but probably good to be explicit about "who" is > shepherding this SPI

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

I will shephard. On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 07:28, Anton Okolnychyi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - Anton > > ср, 9 квіт. 2025 р. о 15:01 Jungtaek Lim > пише: > >> Btw who is going to shephard this SPIP? I don't see this in the >> doc/JIRA/discussion thread. I understand there are PMC members in th

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (non-binding) El jue, 10 abr 2025, 1:50, Burak Yavuz escribió: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 4:33 PM Szehon Ho wrote: > >> +1 really excited to finally see Materialized View finally make its way >> to Spark, as many other ecosystem projects (Trino, Starrocks, soon Iceberg) >> already suppo

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:07 AM Rishab Joshi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:05 AM Sem wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 07:22 -0700, Sandy Ryza wrote: >> >> We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to >> move to a formal

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (non-binding) Excuse the thumb typos On Wed, 09 Apr 2025 at 7:22 AM, Sandy Ryza wrote: > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move > to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: * > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 10:55 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:22 AM Sandy Ryza wrote: > > > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to > move to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > > > *Discussion thread: * > http

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1. Really exciting to see the community actively investing on decorative pipeline APIs and materialized views. Thanks. DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1 > On Apr 9, 2025, at 9:43 AM, Jules Damji wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Excuse the thumb typos > > > On W

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:03 Chao Sun wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 10:55 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:22 AM Sandy Ryza wrote: >> > >> > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to >> move to a formal vote on a

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

Btw who is going to shephard this SPIP? I don't see this in the doc/JIRA/discussion thread. I understand there are PMC members in the author list, but probably good to be explicit about "who" is shepherding this SPIP. On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:22 PM Sandy Ryza wrote: > We started to get some vot

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Szehon On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 3:42 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > I will shephard. > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 07:28, Anton Okolnychyi > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> - Anton >> >> ср, 9 квіт. 2025 р. о 15:01 Jungtaek Lim >> пише: >> >>> Btw who is going to shephard this

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 really excited to finally see Materialized View finally make its way to Spark, as many other ecosystem projects (Trino, Starrocks, soon Iceberg) already supporting it. Thanks Szehon On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 2:33 AM Martin Grund wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:37 AM Mich Talebzadeh >

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 7:30 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 3:42 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > >> I will shephard. >> >> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 07:28, Anton Okolnychyi >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> - Anton >>> >>> ср, 9

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 07:22 -0700, Sandy Ryza wrote: > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to > move to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: > * https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f829ps0bog41fjoqc45xk7

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:05 AM Sem wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 07:22 -0700, Sandy Ryza wrote: > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move > to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion th

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:57 AM Martin Grund wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:43 PM Denny Lee wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:03 Chao Sun wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 10:55 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote: >>> +1 On Wed, Apr 9, 20

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 Dr Mich Talebzadeh, Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR view my Linkedin profile On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 20:05, Gengliang Wang wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:57 AM Martin Grund > wr

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:40 PM DB Tsai wrote: > +1. > > Really exciting to see the community actively investing on decorative > pipeline APIs and materialized views. Thanks. > > DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1 > > On Apr 9, 2025, at 9:43 AM, Jules Damji wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:22 AM Sandy Ryza wrote: > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move to > a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: * > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f829ps0bog41fjoqc45xk7m574ly > *SPIP

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 4:33 PM Szehon Ho wrote: > +1 really excited to finally see Materialized View finally make its way to > Spark, as many other ecosystem projects (Trino, Starrocks, soon Iceberg) > already supporting it. > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 2:33 AM Martin Grund

[VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. *Discussion thread: * https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f829ps0bog41fjoqc45xk7m574ly *SPIP:* https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PsSTngFuRVEOvUGzp_25CQL1yfzFHF

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (binding) Super exciting to have this! On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:43 AM Jules Damji wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Excuse the thumb typos > > > On Wed, 09 Apr 2025 at 7:22 AM, Sandy Ryza wrote: > >> We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to >> move to a formal vote

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (binding) On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 10:37 AM Reynold Xin wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Super exciting to have this! > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:43 AM Jules Damji wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Excuse the thumb typos >> >> >> On Wed, 09 Apr 2025 at 7:22 AM, Sandy Ryza wrote: >> >>> We started

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:22 PM Sandy Ryza wrote: > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move > to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: * > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f829ps0bog41fjoqc45xk7m5

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:51 AM Cheng Pan wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Glad to see Spark SQL extended to streaming use cases. > > Thanks, > Cheng Pan > > > > On Apr 9, 2025, at 14:43, Anton Okolnychyi wrote: > > +1 > > вт, 8 квіт. 2025 р. о 23:36 Jacky Lee пише: > >> +1 I'm delighted that i

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 Dr Mich Talebzadeh, Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR view my Linkedin profile On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 08:07, Peter Toth wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:51 AM Cheng Pan wrote: > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:37 AM Mich Talebzadeh wrote: > +1 > > Dr Mich Talebzadeh, > Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR > >view my Linkedin profile > > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 08:07, Pete

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

+1 Kent Yao Sem 于2025年4月9日周三 14:08写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > > On April 9, 2025 7:29:40 AM GMT+02:00, Rishab Joshi > wrote: > >> +1 Exciting. >> Rishab Joshi >> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025, 10:04 PM Ruifeng Zheng wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 12:57 PM Denny Lee wrote: >>> +