+1， Agree to remove the jar files from the Apache Spark repository and disable
the affected tests.
For the current test scenarios that use jar files, I believe we can definitely
find a more reasonable testing approach.
Thanks,
Jie Yang
On 2025/02/26 16:57:45 "Rozov, Vlad" wrote:
> +1 on fixi
+1 on fixing test jars, though the way how it is fixed needs to be discussed,
IMO. In the short term removing jars may still be the best option to satisfy
ASF legal policy and avoid release removal.
AFAIK, ASF mandates that users and developers have source code that they build
from (source rele
I'd go along with that tradeoff, if the tests aren't that important - are
they? I didn't see any discussion of what if anything we lose.
I don't find the 'literal' interpretation compelling; the vulnerability one
is, though, I don't think there is any evidence it affects these .jars.
On Wed, Feb 2
The vote passes with 23 +1s (11 binding +1s).
Thanks to all who helped with the vote!
(* = binding)
+1:
- Dongjoon Hyun *
- Mich Talebzadeh
- Reynold Xin *
- Jules Damji
- Angel Alvarez Pascua
- Fokko Driesprong
- L. C. Hsieh *
- Serge Rielau
- Huaxin Gao *
- John Zhuge
- Wenchen Fan *
- Hyukjin K
The gist of the initial 2018 thread was:
These are not source .jar files that users use, but .jar files used to test
loading of from .jar files. These are test resources only.
I don't think this is what the spirit of the rule is speaking to, that the
end-user code should always have source code, wh
Thank you for your reply, Sean.
I expected that argument exactly so that I started by quoting your sentence in
the above.
I understood the reasoning in 2018. However, there are two reasons why I
brought this again in 2025:
First, the open source sprit is technically and literally "no compiled
-0 (non-binding).
IMO, it will be good to address
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-51318 to avoid legal issues and
meet ASF source release policy.
Thank you,
Vlad
On Feb 25, 2025, at 2:51 AM, Kent Yao wrote:
+1
Kent
On 2025/02/25 10:26:38 Max Gekk wrote:
+1, since SPARK-51281 i
Thank you for the explicit casting, Vlad.
BTW, the Apache Spark 3.5.5 RC1 vote will continue like all the previous Apache
Spark RC votes because there is no agreement on those test resources (jar
files) among Apache Spark PMC members. The following discussion thread will
lead us subsequent comm
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:20 AM Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
> Thank you for the explicit casting, Vlad.
>
> BTW, the Apache Spark 3.5.5 RC1 vote will continue like all the previous
> Apache Spark RC votes because there is no agreement on those test resources
> (jar files) among Apache
+1 (non-binding)
* Verified all checksums.
* Verified all signatures.
* Built from source, with multiple profiles, to full success:
* build/mvn -T 8 -Phadoop-cloud -Phive-thriftserver -Pkubernetes -Pyarn
-DskipTests clean package
* Tests passed.
* Ran several examples successfully:
* bin/s
+1 (non-binding)
Pass integration tests with Apache Kyuubi.
Thanks,
Cheng Pan
> On Feb 27, 2025, at 14:04, Chris Nauroth wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Verified all checksums.
> * Verified all signatures.
> * Built from source, with multiple profiles, to full success:
> * build/mvn -
12 matches
Mail list logo
