Re: Vote on Dynamic resource allocation for structured streaming [SPARK-24815]

2024-02-22 Thread Mich Talebzadeh
I can see it was closed. Was it because of inactivity? Mich Talebzadeh, Dad | Technologist | Solutions Architect | Engineer London United Kingdom view my Linkedin profile https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh *Disclaimer

Re: Vote on Dynamic resource allocation for structured streaming [SPARK-24815]

2024-02-22 Thread Pavan Kotikalapudi
Yes. The PR was closed due to inactivity by github actions.. The msg also says > If you'd like to revive this PR, please reopen it and ask a committer to remove the Stale tag! On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 1:09 AM Mich Talebzadeh wr

Re: Vote on Dynamic resource allocation for structured streaming [SPARK-24815]

2024-02-22 Thread Mich Talebzadeh
Hi Pavan, Do you have a list of votes for this feature by any chance? Does it pass the required condition as approved? HTH Mich Talebzadeh, Dad | Technologist | Solutions Architect | Engineer London United Kingdom view my Linkedin profile

Re: Generating config docs automatically

2024-02-22 Thread Nicholas Chammas
Thank you, Holden! Yes, having everything live in the ConfigEntry is attractive. The main reason I proposed an alternative where the groups are defined in YAML is that if the config groups are defined in ConfigEntry, then altering the groupings – which is relevant only to the display of config

Vote on Dynamic resource allocation for structured streaming [SPARK-24815]

2024-02-22 Thread Sona Torosyan
+1

Re: Vote on Dynamic resource allocation for structured streaming [SPARK-24815]

2024-02-22 Thread Pavan Kotikalapudi
Hi Mich, We have five +1s till now. Mich Talebzadeh Adam Hobbs Pavan Kotikalapudi Krystal Mitchell Sona Torosyan (few more in github pr) +0: None -1: None Does it pass the required condition as approved? Not sure of that though, nothing about minimum required is mentioned in the past emails

Re: Vote on Dynamic resource allocation for structured streaming [SPARK-24815]

2024-02-22 Thread Mich Talebzadeh
Hi, please check this doc Spark Project Improvement Proposals (SPIP) | Apache Spark and specifically the below extract Discussing an SPIP All discussion of an SPIP should take place in a public forum, preferably the discussion attached to t