I am pretty certain you need to change the write.format from “es” to “org.elasticsearch.spark.sql”Sent from my iPhoneOn 8 Sep 2023, at 03:10, Dipayan Dev wrote:++ DevOn Thu, 7 Sep 2023 at 10:22 PM, Dipayan Dev wrote:Hi, Can you please elaborate your last response? I don’
Let me try that and get back. Just wondering, if there a change in the way
we pass the format in connector from Spark 2 to 3?
On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 at 12:35 PM, Alfie Davidson
wrote:
> I am pretty certain you need to change the write.format from “es” to
> “org.elasticsearch.spark.sql”
>
> Sent fr
@Alfie Davidson : Awesome, it worked with
"“org.elasticsearch.spark.sql”"
But as soon as I switched to *elasticsearch-spark-20_2.12, *"es" also
worked.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 12:45 PM Dipayan Dev wrote:
>
> Let me try that and get back. Just wondering, if there a change in the
> way we pass t
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for driving this release!
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 11:29 AM Holden Karau wrote:
> +1 pip installing seems to function :)
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 7:22 PM Yuming Wang wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 10:33 PM yangjie01
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *发件
Sorry but I'm -1 because there exists a late-arrival correctness patch
although it's not a regression.
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-44805
"Data lost after union using
spark.sql.parquet.enableNestedColumnVectorizedReader=true"
- https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42850
-
https:/
+1
Thank you for driving the release!
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 10:12 AM Jungtaek Lim
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks for driving this release!
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 11:29 AM Holden Karau wrote:
>
>> +1 pip installing seems to function :)
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 7:22 PM Yuming Wang
@Dongjoon Hyun Thank you for reporting this and
for your prompt response.
The vote has failed. I'll cut RC5 tonight, PST time.
Dongjoon Hyun 于2023年9月8日周五 15:57写道:
> Sorry but I'm -1 because there exists a late-arrival correctness patch
> although it's not a regression.
>
> - https://issues.apa
This issue is not a regression and yet we fail the vote? Couldn't this
issue have been fixed in 3.5.1?
Sorry I am new, so maybe this is how it works?
On Sat, 9 Sep 2023, 02:29 Dongjoon Hyun, wrote:
> Sorry but I'm -1 because there exists a late-arrival correctness patch
> although it's not a r