Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.4.0 (RC7)

2023-04-09 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
+1 I verified the same steps like previous RCs. Dongjoon. On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 7:47 PM Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > > +1 > > Signatures, digests, etc check out fine. > Checked out tag and build/tested with -Phive -Pyarn -Pmesos -Pkubernetes > > Regards, > Mridul > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at

[VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.2.4 (RC1)

2023-04-09 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 3.2.4. The vote is open until August 13th 1AM (PST) and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.2.4 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because .

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.2.4 (RC1)

2023-04-09 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
Oh, there is a typo in the mail. The following should be `April` instead of `August`. > August 13th 1AM (PST) Dongjoon. On 2023/04/09 23:38:00 Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > 3.2.4. > > The vote is open until August 13th 1AM (P

[VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.2.4 (RC1)

2023-04-09 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 3.2.4. The vote is open until April 13th 1AM (PST) and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.2.4 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ..

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.2.4 (RC1)

2023-04-09 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
I'll start with my +1. I verified the checksum, signatures of the artifacts, and documentations. Also, ran the tests with YARN and K8s modules. Dongjoon. On 2023/04/09 23:46:10 Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > 3.2.4. > > The vote

Re: Slack for Spark Community: Merging various threads

2023-04-09 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
Thank you, Holden, Bjorn, Maciej. Yes, those are also valid. Dongjoon. On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 4:20 AM Maciej wrote: > @Bjørn Matrix (represented by element in the linked summary. Also, since > the last year, Rocket Chat uses Matrix under the hood) is already used for > user support and related