Hi devs,
I'm working on getting Apache Sedona upgraded to work with Spark 3.2, and
ran into a weird issue I wanted to get some feedback on. The PR and current
discussion can be found here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557
To try to sum up in a quick way, this library defines cu
Thanks all for your inputs here!
Seems the discussion already settles, I will be the shepherd for the SPIP and
call for a vote on the SPIP moving forward in a new thread.
On 2021/10/28 13:05:53, Wenchen Fan wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation! It makes sense to always resolve the logical
> t
Hi all,
I’d like to start a vote for SPIP: Storage Partitioned Join for Data Source V2.
The proposal is to support a new type of join: storage partitioned join which
covers bucket join support for DataSourceV2 but is more general. The goal
is to let Spark leverage distribution properties reported
I'll start with my +1.
On 2021/10/29 17:30:03, L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’d like to start a vote for SPIP: Storage Partitioned Join for Data Source
> V2.
>
> The proposal is to support a new type of join: storage partitioned join which
> covers bucket join support for DataSourceV2 b
+1 This is a great idea, (I have no Apache Spark voting points)
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:41 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> I'll start with my +1.
>
> On 2021/10/29 17:30:03, L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I’d like to start a vote for SPIP: Storage Partitioned Join for Data
> Source V2.
> >
+1
Dongjoon
On 2021/10/29 17:48:59, Russell Spitzer wrote:
> +1 This is a great idea, (I have no Apache Spark voting points)
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:41 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> >
> > I'll start with my +1.
> >
> > On 2021/10/29 17:30:03, L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
+1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:59 AM Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
> +1
>
> Dongjoon
>
> On 2021/10/29 17:48:59, Russell Spitzer
> wrote:
> > +1 This is a great idea, (I have no Apache Spark voting points)
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:41 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'll start with my +1.
+1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:06 AM huaxin gao wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:59 AM Dongjoon Hyun
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Dongjoon
>>
>> On 2021/10/29 17:48:59, Russell Spitzer
>> wrote:
>> > +1 This is a great idea, (I have no Apache Spark voting points)
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2
+1
DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:42 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:06 AM huaxin gao
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:59 AM Dongjoon Hyun
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Dongjoon
>>>
>>> On 2021/10/
+1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:07 PM DB Tsai wrote:
> +1
>
> DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:42 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:06 AM huaxin gao
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:59 AM
+1
Thanks,
Cheng Su
From: Holden Karau
Date: Friday, October 29, 2021 at 12:41 PM
To: DB Tsai
Cc: Dongjoon Hyun , Ryan Blue , dev
, huaxin gao
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Storage Partitioned Join for Data Source V2
+1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:07 PM DB Tsai wrote:
+1
DB Tsai | https://www.
11 matches
Mail list logo