I'm fine with the view definition proposed here, but my major concern is
how to make sure table/view share the same namespace. According to the SQL
spec, if there is a view named "a", we can't create a table named "a"
anymore.
We can add documents and ask the implementation to guarantee it, but it
Thanks for the feedback. I am preparing a doc and a PoC, will post soon.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:17 AM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> I'm fine with the view definition proposed here, but my major concern is
> how to make sure table/view share the same namespace. According to the SQL
> spec, if there is
>
> 1. On the technical side, my main concern is the runtime dependency on
> org.opencypher:okapi-shade. okapi depends on several Scala libraries. We
> came out with the solution to shade a few Scala libraries to avoid
> pollution. However, I'm not super confident that the approach is
> sustainable
thanks jon!
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:25 PM Jon Kuroda wrote:
>
> Jenkins is back up and building. Build queue purged, builders are building.
> Fiat Lux --Jon
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:58 PM Shane Knapp wrote:
>>
>> finally, some good news! power was just restored to campus.
>>
>> i'm abou
Maybe let’s ask the folks from Lightbend who helped with the previous scala
upgrade for their thoughts?
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 8:24 PM Xiao Li wrote:
> 1. On the technical side, my main concern is the runtime dependency on
>> org.opencypher:okapi-shade. okapi depends on several Scala libraries.
Hi HeartSaVioR,
> It might be due to empty batch
Yeah...that's my understanding too. It's for a streaming aggregation in
Append output mode so that's possible. I'll have a closer look at it.
Thanks much for keeping up with this and the other questions. Much
appreciated!
Pozdrawiam,
Jacek Laskow
