Re: SparkConf constructor now private

2016-03-15 Thread Pete Robbins
Is the SparkConf effectively a singleton? Could there be a Utils method to return a clone of the SparkConf? Cheers On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 at 16:49 Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > Oh, my bad. I think I left that from a previous part of the patch and > forgot to revert it. Will fix. > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016

Re: SparkConf constructor now private

2016-03-15 Thread Marcelo Vanzin
Oh, my bad. I think I left that from a previous part of the patch and forgot to revert it. Will fix. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Koert Kuipers wrote: > in this commit > > 8301fadd8d269da11e72870b7a889596e3337839 > Author: Marcelo Vanzin > Date: Mon Mar 14 14:27:33 2016 -0700 > [SPARK-1362

SparkConf constructor now private

2016-03-15 Thread Koert Kuipers
in this commit 8301fadd8d269da11e72870b7a889596e3337839 Author: Marcelo Vanzin Date: Mon Mar 14 14:27:33 2016 -0700 [SPARK-13626][CORE] Avoid duplicate config deprecation warnings. the following change was made -class SparkConf(loadDefaults: Boolean) extends Cloneable with Logging { +class Sp