Most these files are just package-info.java there for having a good package
index for JavaDoc. If we move them, we will need to create a folder in the
java one for each package that exposes any documentation. And it is very
likely we will forget to update package-info.java when we update
package.sc
There are actually 33 instances of a Java file in src/main/scala -- I
opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10576 to track a
discussion and decision.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:10 PM, lonikar wrote:
> It does not cause any problem when building using maven. But when doing
> eclipse:ec
It does not cause any problem when building using maven. But when doing
eclipse:eclipse, the generated .classpath files contained only
. This caused
all the .scala sources to be ignored and caused all kinds of eclipse build
errors. It resolved only when I added prebuild jars in the java build path,
This is probably true as the scala plugin actually compiles both
.scala and .java files. Still it seems like the wrong place just as a
matter of style. Can we try moving it and verify it's still OK?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> There isn't really any difference I think
There isn't really any difference I think where you put them. Did you run
into a problem?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I feel like I knew the answer to this but have forgotten. Reynold do
> you know about this file? looks like you added it.
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:1
I feel like I knew the answer to this but have forgotten. Reynold do
you know about this file? looks like you added it.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:10 PM, lonikar wrote:
> I found these files:
> spark-1.5.0/sql/catalyst/*src/main/scala*/org/apache/spark/sql/types/*SQLUserDefinedType.java*
>
> spark
I found these files:
spark-1.5.0/sql/catalyst/*src/main/scala*/org/apache/spark/sql/types/*SQLUserDefinedType.java*
spark-1.5.0/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/api/java/function/package.scala
and several java files in spark-1.5.0/core/src/main/scala/.
Is this intentional or inadvertant?
--
