Should be binary-compatible across 2.10.x, so yes.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Really - I didn't know this ever was changed. But in any case, I think you
> can compile with 2.10.4 and run with 2.10.3 and it's fine - right?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ma
Really - I didn't know this ever was changed. But in any case, I think you
can compile with 2.10.4 and run with 2.10.3 and it's fine - right?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> We don't actually use Scala from the user's OS anymore, we use it from the
> Spark build, so it's
We don’t actually use Scala from the user’s OS anymore, we use it from the
Spark build, so it’s not a big deal. This release just has some bug fixes.
Matei
On Mar 28, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Kay Ousterhout wrote:
> What do we get by upgrading to 2.10.4? Just wondering if it's worth the
> annoyance
What do we get by upgrading to 2.10.4? Just wondering if it's worth the
annoyance of everyone needing to download a new version of Scala, making
yet another version of the AMIs, etc.
-Kay
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Sounds good. Feel free to send a PR even though it
Sounds good. Feel free to send a PR even though it’s a small change (it leads
to better Git history and such).
Matei
On Mar 27, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Mark Hamstra wrote:
> FYI, Spark master does build cleanly and the tests do run successfully with
> Scala version set to 2.10.4, so we can probably
FYI, Spark master does build cleanly and the tests do run successfully with
Scala version set to 2.10.4, so we can probably bump 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT to use
the new version anytime we care to.
