7:08 AM
> *To:* Joel Zambrano
> *Cc:* dev@spark.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: RestSubmissionClient Basic Auth
>
> Either way is fine. Relay proxy would be much easier, adding
> authentication to the REST client would require you to rebuild and test the
> piece of code that
l Das
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:07:08 AM
To: Joel Zambrano
Cc: dev@spark.apache.org
Subject: Re: RestSubmissionClient Basic Auth
Either way is fine. Relay proxy would be much easier, adding authentication to
the REST client would require you to rebuild and test the piece of code that
you wrot
Either way is fine. Relay proxy would be much easier, adding authentication
to the REST client would require you to rebuild and test the piece of code
that you wrote for authentication.
Thanks
Best Regards
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Joel Zambrano wrote:
> Hi! We have a gateway with basic
Hi! We have a gateway with basic auth that relays calls to the head node in our
cluster. Is adding support for basic auth the wrong approach? Should we use a
relay proxy? I've seen the code and it would probably require adding a few
configs and appending the header on the get and post request of
