Luciano,
afaik the spark-package-tool also makes it easy to upload packages to
spark-packages website. You are of course free to include any maven
coordinate in the --packages parameter
--jakob
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> Thanks for the info Burak, I will check the rep
Thanks for the info Burak, I will check the repo you mention, do you know
concretely what is the 'magic' that spark-packages need or if is there any
document with info about it ?
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> +1000
>
> Thanks Ismael for bringing this up! I meant to have send it earlier too
> since I've been struggling with a sbt-based Scala project for a Spark
> package myself this week and haven't yet found out how to do local
> publishing.
>
Hi Ismael and Jacek,
If you use Maven for building your applications, you may use the
spark-package command line tool (
https://github.com/databricks/spark-package-cmd-tool) to perform packaging.
It requires you to build your jar using maven first, and then does all the
extra magic that Spark Pack
+1000
Thanks Ismael for bringing this up! I meant to have send it earlier too
since I've been struggling with a sbt-based Scala project for a Spark
package myself this week and haven't yet found out how to do local
publishing.
If such a guide existed for Maven I could use it for sbt easily too :-
Yup netlib lgpl right now is activated through a profile...if we can reuse
the same idea then csparse can also be added to spark with a lgpl flag. But
again as Sean said its tricky. Better to keep it on spark packages for
users to try.
On May 24, 2015 1:36 AM, "Sean Owen" wrote:
> I dont believe
I dont believe we are talking about adding things to the Apache project,
but incidentally LGPL is not OK in Apache projects either.
On May 24, 2015 6:12 AM, "DB Tsai" wrote:
> I thought LGPL is okay but GPL is not okay for Apache project.
>
> On Saturday, May 23, 2015, Patrick Wendell wrote:
>
>
That's the nice thing about Spark packages. It is just a package index for
libraries and applications built on top of Spark and not part of the Spark
codebase, so it is not restricted to follow only ASF-compatible licenses.
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, DB Tsai wrote:
> I thought LGPL is ok
I thought LGPL is okay but GPL is not okay for Apache project.
On Saturday, May 23, 2015, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Yes - spark packages can include non ASF licenses.
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Debasish Das > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible to add GPL/LGPL code on spark packages
Yes - spark packages can include non ASF licenses.
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Debasish Das wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to add GPL/LGPL code on spark packages or it must be licensed
> under Apache as well ?
>
> I want to expose Professor Tim Davis's LGPL library for sparse algebra and
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
