Re: possible bug: user SparkConf properties not copied to worker process

2015-08-13 Thread rfarrjr
That works. -- View this message in context: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/possible-bug-user-SparkConf-properties-not-copied-to-worker-process-tp13665p13689.html Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: possible bug: user SparkConf properties not copied to worker process

2015-08-13 Thread Reynold Xin
Is this through Java properties? For java properties, you can pass them using spark.executor.extraJavaOptions. On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:11 PM, rfarrjr wrote: > Thanks for the response. > > In this particular case we passed a url that would be leveraged when > configuring some serialization s

Re: possible bug: user SparkConf properties not copied to worker process

2015-08-13 Thread rfarrjr
Thanks for the response. In this particular case we passed a url that would be leveraged when configuring some serialization support for Kryo. We are using a schema registry and leveraging it to efficiently serialize avro objects without the need to register specific records or schemas up front.

Re: possible bug: user SparkConf properties not copied to worker process

2015-08-13 Thread Reynold Xin
That was intentional - what's your use case that require configs not starting with spark? On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:16 AM, rfarrjr wrote: > Ran into an issue setting a property on the SparkConf that wasn't made > available on the worker. After some digging[1] I noticed that only > properties t