thanks. All I'd need would be the base class, so that new tests can be written
to work across branches.
-steve
On 1 Jun 2015, at 18:45, Andrew Or
mailto:and...@databricks.com>> wrote:
It will be within the next few days
2015-06-01 9:17 GMT-07:00 Reynold Xin
mailto:r...@databricks.com>>:
I do
It will be within the next few days
2015-06-01 9:17 GMT-07:00 Reynold Xin :
> I don't think so.
>
>
> On Monday, June 1, 2015, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
>> Is this backported to branch 1.3?
>>
>> On 31 May 2015, at 00:44, Reynold Xin wrote:
>>
>> FYI we merged a patch that improves unit test l
I don't think so.
On Monday, June 1, 2015, Steve Loughran wrote:
> Is this backported to branch 1.3?
>
> On 31 May 2015, at 00:44, Reynold Xin > wrote:
>
> FYI we merged a patch that improves unit test log debugging. In order
> for that to work, all test suites have been changed to extend Sp
Is this backported to branch 1.3?
On 31 May 2015, at 00:44, Reynold Xin
mailto:r...@databricks.com>> wrote:
FYI we merged a patch that improves unit test log debugging. In order for that
to work, all test suites have been changed to extend SparkFunSuite instead of
ScalaTest's FunSuite. We also
