https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Jakob Odersky wrote:
> I'm not an authoritative source but I think it is indeed the plan to
> move the default build to 2.11.
>
> See this discussion for more detail
>
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.na
Its already underway: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Jakob Odersky wrote:
> I'm not an authoritative source but I think it is indeed the plan to
> move the default build to 2.11.
>
> See this discussion for more detail
>
> http://apache-spark-develop
I'm not an authoritative source but I think it is indeed the plan to
move the default build to 2.11.
See this discussion for more detail
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/A-proposal-for-Spark-2-0-td15122.html
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Deenar Toraskar
wrote:
> A re
We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify doing
one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann <
daniel.siegm...@teamaol.com> wrote:
> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during
thanks thats all i needed
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
> conversation.
I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
That's basically an extra 3 mo
