Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

Hi All, Just circling back to see if there is anything blocking the RC that isn't being tracked in JIRA? The current in progress list from ((affectedVersion = 2.1.1 AND cf[12310320] is Empty) OR fixVersion = 2.1.1 OR cf[12310320] = "2.1.1") AND project = spark AND resolution = Unresolved ORDER BY

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

Hi, Michael, Since Daniel Siegmann asked for a bug fix backport in the previous email, I just merged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14536 into Spark 2.1 branch. If this JIRA is not part of Spark 2.1.1 release, could you help me correct the fix version from 2.1.1. to the next release

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

We just fixed the build yesterday. I'll kick off a new RC today. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Asher Krim wrote: > Hey Michael, > any update on this? We're itching for a 2.1.1 release (specifically > SPARK-14804 which is currently blocking us) > > Thanks, > Asher Krim > Senior Software Engin

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

Hey Michael, any update on this? We're itching for a 2.1.1 release (specifically SPARK-14804 which is currently blocking us) Thanks, Asher Krim Senior Software Engineer On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Michael Armbrust wrote: > An update: I cut the tag for RC1 last night. Currently fighting wi

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

An update: I cut the tag for RC1 last night. Currently fighting with the release process. Will post RC1 once I get it working. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Nick Pentreath wrote: > As for SPARK-19759 , I > don't think that needs to be targe

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

As for SPARK-19759 , I don't think that needs to be targeted for 2.1.1 so we don't need to worry about it On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 at 13:49 Holden Karau wrote: > I agree with Michael, I think we've got some outstanding issues but none > of them seem

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

I agree with Michael, I think we've got some outstanding issues but none of them seem like regression from 2.1 so we should be good to start the RC process. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Michael Armbrust wrote: > Please speak up if I'm wrong, but none of these seem like critical > regressions

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

Please speak up if I'm wrong, but none of these seem like critical regressions from 2.1. As such I'll start the RC process later today. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Holden Karau wrote: > I'm not super sure it should be a blocker for 2.1.1 -- is it a regression? > Maybe we can get TDs input

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

I'm not super sure it should be a blocker for 2.1.1 -- is it a regression? Maybe we can get TDs input on it? On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:48 PM Nan Zhu wrote: > I think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19280 should be a > blocker > > Best, > > Nan > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Fel

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

I think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19280 should be a blocker Best, Nan On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Felix Cheung wrote: > I've been scrubbing R and think we are tracking 2 issues > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19237 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

I've been scrubbing R and think we are tracking 2 issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19237 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19925 From: holden.ka...@gmail.com on behalf of Holden Karau Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 3:12:35 PM To:

Re: Outstanding Spark 2.1.1 issues

Any chance of back-porting SPARK-14536 - NPE in JDBCRDD when array column contains nulls (postgresql) It just adds a null check - just a simple bug fix - so it really belongs in Spark 2.1.x. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Holden Karau wrote: