Thanks to the committers and PMC members who chimed in on this thread.
> On Oct 10, 2024, at 3:27 AM, Jungtaek Lim
> wrote:
>
> I'd ask people to quote the part you got from GPT and explicitly call out the
> part as "GPT-generated" so that people would consider that there is
> hallucination.
minor clarification: content from GPT might be valuable - what I meant was,
the value of content from GPT "in the community". The content is either
something people in the thread knows, or something they can query to GPT on
their own. Though I barely use GPT for the query which matters with
experti
+1 on this.
I'd ask people to quote the part you got from GPT and explicitly call out
the part as "GPT-generated" so that people would consider that there is
hallucination. Do not ever expect that people wouldn't know the content GPT
wrote. "People know."
ASF requires every code contribution to e
Agree, I can't really explain this post except as AI hallucination,
because:
- those configs don't exist and it's not a simple typo away from a real one
- they are kind of like unrelated real Spark config names and the kind of
thing it seems an AI would 'infer'
- no claim it was a typo with plausi
FWIW - Mich - I've often found your responses "gpt" like and can often be a
distraction. Now I don't know if that's your actual writing style or you
were indeed using genai tools to generate the responses on your behalf. I
don't think we should sanction you if that's your writing style. But if you
