Please do.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> Should I make up a new ticket for this? Or is there something already
> underway?
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:31 PM Russell Spitzer
> wrote:
>
>> That sounds fine to me, we already do the filtering so populating that
>> field
Should I make up a new ticket for this? Or is there something already
underway?
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:31 PM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> That sounds fine to me, we already do the filtering so populating that
> field would be pretty simple.
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 2:08 PM Michael Armbrust
> w
That sounds fine to me, we already do the filtering so populating that
field would be pretty simple.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 2:08 PM Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> We have to try and maintain binary compatibility here, so probably the
> easiest thing to do here would be to add a method to the class.
We have to try and maintain binary compatibility here, so probably the
easiest thing to do here would be to add a method to the class. Perhaps
something like:
def unhandledFilters(filters: Array[Filter]): Array[Filter] = filters
By default, this could return all filters so behavior would remain
