Ok, I understand your point, thanks. Let me see what I can be done there. I
may come back if it doesn't work out there:-)
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Cody Koeninger wrote:
> Ok... in general it seems to me like effort would be better spent
> trying to help upstream, as opposed to us making a
Ok... in general it seems to me like effort would be better spent
trying to help upstream, as opposed to us making a 5th slightly
different interface to kafka (currently have 0.8 receiver, 0.8
dstream, 0.10 dstream, 0.10 structured stream)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Mark Grover wrote:
> I t
I think they are open to others helping, in fact, more than one person has
worked on the JIRA so far. And, it's been crawling really slowly and that's
preventing adoption of Spark's new connector in secure Kafka environments.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Cody Koeninger wrote:
> Have you asked
Have you asked the assignee on the Kafka jira whether they'd be
willing to accept help on it?
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Mark Grover wrote:
> Hi all,
> We currently have a new direct stream connector, thanks to work by Cody and
> others on SPARK-12177.
>
> However, that can't be used in secu
