gt;>>> felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Instead of using gpg to create the sha512 hash file we could just
>>>>> change to using sha512sum? That would output the right format that is in
>>>>> turns verifiable.
> +1 there
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* Sean Owen
>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 16, 2018 9:51:49 AM
>>> *To:* Felix Cheung
>>> *Cc:* rb...@netflix.com; Nicholas Chammas; Spark dev list
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re:
t; On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:05 AM Felix Cheung
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Instead of using gpg to create the sha512 hash file we could just change
>>> to using sha512sum? That would output the right format that is in turns
>>> verifiable.
>>>
>>>
>
cholas Chammas; Spark dev list
>
> *Subject:* Re: Changing how we compute release hashes
> I think the issue with that is that OS X doesn't have "sha512sum". Both it
> and Linux have "shasum -a 512" though.
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:05 AM Felix Cheu
+1 there
From: Sean Owen
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 9:51:49 AM
To: Felix Cheung
Cc: rb...@netflix.com; Nicholas Chammas; Spark dev list
Subject: Re: Changing how we compute release hashes
I think the issue with that is that OS X doesn't have "sha512
um? That would output the right format that is in turns
> verifiable.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Ryan Blue
> *Sent:* Friday, March 16, 2018 8:31:45 AM
> *To:* Nicholas Chammas
> *Cc:* Spark dev list
> *Subject:* Re: Changing how we compute release hashes
&
: Re: Changing how we compute release hashes
+1 It's possible to produce the same file with gpg, but the sha*sum utilities
are a bit easier to remember the syntax for.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Nicholas Chammas
mailto:nicholas.cham...@gmail.com>> wrote:
To verify that I’ve d
+1 It's possible to produce the same file with gpg, but the sha*sum
utilities are a bit easier to remember the syntax for.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Nicholas Chammas <
nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To verify that I’ve downloaded a Hadoop release correctly, I can just do
> this:
>
>
