I believe it will be in the main repo.
Burak
- Original Message -
From: "Kyle Ellrott"
To: "Burak Yavuz"
Cc: dev@spark.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:48:54 AM
Subject: Re: [mllib] State of Multi-Model training
This sounds like a pretty major re
dback from you and the rest of the
> community!
>
> Best,
> Burak
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kyle Ellrott"
> To: "Burak Yavuz"
> Cc: dev@spark.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 9:41:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [mllib] Sta
ny feedback from you and the rest of the
community!
Best,
Burak
- Original Message -
From: "Kyle Ellrott"
To: "Burak Yavuz"
Cc: dev@spark.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 9:41:45 PM
Subject: Re: [mllib] State of Multi-Model training
I'd be intereste
I'd be interested in helping to test your code as soon as its available.
The version I wrote used a paired RDD and combined by key, it worked best
if it used a custom partitioner that put all the samples in the same area.
Running things in batched matrices would probably speed things up greatly.
Yo
Hi Kyle,
I'm actively working on it now. It's pretty close to completion, I'm just
trying to figure out bottlenecks and optimize as much as possible.
As Phase 1, I implemented multi model training on Gradient Descent. Instead of
performing Vector-Vector operations on rows (examples) and weights,
