ent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:12:45 AM
> To: Sean Owen
> Cc: Marcelo Vanzin; dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)
>
> Alright, uploaded the missing packages.
>
> I'll send a PR to update the release scripts just in case...
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:08
If I recall we stop releasing Hadoop 2.3 or 2.4 in newer releases (2.2+?) -
that might be why they are not the release script.
From: Marcelo Vanzin
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:12:45 AM
To: Sean Owen
Cc: Marcelo Vanzin; dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3
Alright, uploaded the missing packages.
I'll send a PR to update the release scripts just in case...
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> If it's easy enough to produce them, I agree you can just add them to the RC
> dir.
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:56 AM Marcelo Vanzin
> wro
If it's easy enough to produce them, I agree you can just add them to the
RC dir.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:56 AM Marcelo Vanzin
wrote:
> I just noticed this RC is missing builds for hadoop 2.3 and 2.4, which
> existed in the previous version:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/spark/
I just noticed this RC is missing builds for hadoop 2.3 and 2.4, which
existed in the previous version:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/spark/spark-2.1.2/
How important do we think are those? I think I can just build them and
publish them to the RC directory without having to create a n
> Cc: Felix Cheung; dev
>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)
>
> Yeah, we should be more careful with that in general. Like we state
> that "Spark runs on Java 8+"...
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Tom Graves wrote:
>> Right we say we support R3
Exactly...
From: Marcelo Vanzin
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 9:16:08 AM
To: Tom Graves
Cc: Felix Cheung; dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)
Yeah, we should be more careful with that in general. Like we state
that "Spark runs on Java 8+"...
O
>
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Spark-2-1-2-RC2-tt22540.html#a22555
>
> Since it isn’t a regression I’d say +1 from me.
>
>
>
> From: Tom Graves
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:56:16 AM
> To: Marc
lix Cheung
wrote:
Yes, this is broken with newer version of R.
We check explicitly for warning for the R check which should fail the test run.
From: Marcelo Vanzin
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 6:55 PM
To: Felix Cheung
Cc: Marcelo Vanzin; Tom Graves; dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)
.nabble.com/VOTE-Spark-2-1-2-RC2-tt22540.html#a22555
Since it isn’t a regression I’d say +1 from me.
From: Tom Graves
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:56:16 AM
To: Marcelo Vanzin; Felix Cheung
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)
If this is just supporting
:
Yes, this is broken with newer version of R.
We check explicitly for warning for the R check which should fail the test run.
From: Marcelo Vanzin
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 6:55 PM
To: Felix Cheung
Cc: Marcelo Vanzin; Tom Graves; dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2) Not sure I
lakes:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/user/vanzin/my-views/view/Spark/
(Look for the 2.1 branch jobs.)
>
> From: Marcelo Vanzin
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 6:55 PM
> To: Felix Cheung
> Cc: Marcelo Vanzin; Tom Graves; dev
>
> Sub
, y = TRUE, contrasts = NULL, ...)
> Argument names in code not in docs:
> singular.ok
> Mismatches in argument names:
> Position: 16 Code: singular.ok Docs: contrasts
> Position: 17 Code: contrasts Docs: ...
>
>
> From: Sean Owen
> Sent: W
contrasts = NULL, ...)
> Argument names in code not in docs:
> singular.ok
> Mismatches in argument names:
> Position: 16 Code: singular.ok Docs: contrasts
> Position: 17 Code: contrasts Docs: ...
>
>
> From: Sean Owen
> Sent: Wednesday, June
ar.ok Docs: contrasts
Position: 17 Code: contrasts Docs: ...
From: Sean Owen
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 5:02:37 AM
To: Marcelo Vanzin
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)
+1 from me too for the usual reasons.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:25 PM Marcelo Vanzin
wrote:
Please vo
+1 from me too for the usual reasons.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:25 PM Marcelo Vanzin
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.1.3.
>
> The vote is open until Fri, June 29th @ 9PM UTC (2PM PDT) and passes if a
> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a m
Starting with my own +1.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.1.3.
>
> The vote is open until Fri, June 29th @ 9PM UTC (2PM PDT) and passes if a
> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3
17 matches
Mail list logo
