Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 1:42 PM Shubham Patel wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, 23 Feb 2025, 21:21 Max Gekk, wrote: > >> Hi Spark devs, >> >> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP >> [2]. The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type >> should c

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Sun, 23 Feb 2025, 21:21 Max Gekk, wrote: > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type > should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL > standard.

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 (non-binding) Thank you, Vlad On Feb 25, 2025, at 1:33 AM, Sakthi wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:50 AM Kent Yao mailto:y...@apache.org>> wrote: +1(binding), Thank you, Max! Kent Armaan Sait mailto:armaansait...@gmail.com>> 于2025年2月25日周二 06:11写道： +1 Thanks & Regard

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:50 AM Kent Yao wrote: > +1(binding), > > Thank you, Max! > > Kent > > Armaan Sait 于2025年2月25日周二 06:11写道： > >> +1 >> >> *Thanks & Regards,* >> Armaan Sait >> *LinkedIn:* Armaan Sait | LinkedIn >> >> >> >> On S

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1(binding), Thank you, Max! Kent Armaan Sait 于2025年2月25日周二 06:11写道： > +1 > > *Thanks & Regards,* > Armaan Sait > *LinkedIn:* Armaan Sait | LinkedIn > > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 1

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 *Thanks & Regards,* Armaan Sait *LinkedIn:* Armaan Sait | LinkedIn On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge wrote: >> >

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On 2025/02/24 05:30:34 Jungtaek Lim wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:26 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 8:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On M

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:26 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 8:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge wrote: >>> +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 8:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> John Zhuge >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao >>> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> John Zhuge >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com >>> wrote: >>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > John Zhuge > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com >> wrote: >> >>> +1 it’s abt time. >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> > On Feb 23, 2025, a

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 (non-binding) John Zhuge On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com wrote: > >> +1 it’s abt time. >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Feb 23, 2025, at 12:25 PM, L. C. Hsieh wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com wrote: > +1 it’s abt time. > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Feb 23, 2025, at 12:25 PM, L. C. Hsieh wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk wrote: > >> > >> Hi Spark devs, > >> > >> Following the discussion [1], I'd

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 it’s abt time. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 23, 2025, at 12:25 PM, L. C. Hsieh wrote: > > +1 > >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk wrote: >> >> Hi Spark devs, >> >> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. >> The SPIP aims to add a new data typ

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk wrote: > > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type should > conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL stand

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Max! Kind regards, Fokko Op zo 23 feb 2025 om 19:35 schreef Ángel : > + 1 (non-binding) > > El dom, 23 feb 2025, 16:51, Max Gekk escribió: > >> Hi Spark devs, >> >> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP >> [2]. The SPIP aims to add a new

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+ 1 (non-binding) El dom, 23 feb 2025, 16:51, Max Gekk escribió: > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type > should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by th

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+ 1 (non-binding) Excuse the thumb typos On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 at 7:50 AM, Max Gekk wrote: > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type > should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk wrote: > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type > should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL > standa

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 for me following my recent comments on the discussion thread on this topic as well Dr Mich Talebzadeh, Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR view my Linkedin profile On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 at 17:16,

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 Thank you, Max. Dongjoon. On 2025/02/23 15:49:58 Max Gekk wrote: > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type > should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined b