Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

Agreed. Let me start a voting thread for this and move the existing +1s to the new thread. Mridul Muralidharan 于2025年5月19日周一 08:44写道： > > Please start an explicit vote thread - so that it is not confusing. > > This shows us as a DISCUSS thread currently. > > Regards, > Mridul > > On Mon, May 19,

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

Please start an explicit vote thread - so that it is not confusing. This shows us as a DISCUSS thread currently. Regards, Mridul On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:44 AM Niranjan Jayakar wrote: > Thank you Renji and Fokko for your responses. Let's move forward with a > separate repo then. > > +1. > > O

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

Thank you Renji and Fokko for your responses. Let's move forward with a separate repo then. +1. On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 1:12 PM Denny Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 02:42 Renjie Liu wrote: > >> +1 （non-binding) >> >> Hi, Niranjan: >> >> We also had a discussion whe

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 02:42 Renjie Liu wrote: > +1 （non-binding) > > Hi, Niranjan: > > We also had a discussion when starting different > language implementations(too old and I can't find the link to the original > thread), and eventually we decided to use separate repos. It

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

+1 （non-binding) Hi, Niranjan: We also had a discussion when starting different language implementations(too old and I can't find the link to the original thread), and eventually we decided to use separate repos. It turns out to work quite well. Among all the benefits, the most important one is

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

+1 On Sun, May 18, 2025, 23:27 huaxin gao wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 1:48 PM Jules Damji wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> — >> Sent from my iPhone >> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) >> >> On May 16, 2025, at 10:22 AM, Yuanjian Li wrote: >> >>  >> >> Happy to see the Rust client pro

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

+1 On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 1:48 PM Jules Damji wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > — > Sent from my iPhone > Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) > > On May 16, 2025, at 10:22 AM, Yuanjian Li wrote: > >  > > Happy to see the Rust client proposal and glad to help with the follow-up > repo management work. >

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

+1 (non-binding) —Sent from my iPhonePardon the dumb thumb typos :)On May 16, 2025, at 10:22 AM, Yuanjian Li wrote: Happy to see the Rust client proposal and glad to help with the follow-up repo management work. Let’s use this thread for voting—posting my +1 here.Jules Damji

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

Happy to see the Rust client proposal and glad to help with the follow-up repo management work. Let’s use this thread for voting—posting my +1 here. Jules Damji ： > I’ll ask them. > > Cheers > Jules > > Excuse the thumb typos > > > On Fri, 16 May 2025 at 2:38 AM, Renjie Liu > wrote: > >> Thank

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

I’ll ask them. Cheers Jules Excuse the thumb typos On Fri, 16 May 2025 at 2:38 AM, Renjie Liu wrote: > Thanks Denny and Jules for the response. > > It seems there is no objection about this proposal, would some > committer/PMC member help to create the repo? > > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 3:45 A

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

+1 yes, having in one place may be desirable but the release & build process could be onerous. I would keep them separate in their respective repos. Cheers Jules Excuse the thumb typos On Fri, 16 May 2025 at 6:53 AM, Fokko Driesprong wrote: > Hi Niranjan, > > Thanks for jumping in here. I hav

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

Hi Niranjan, Thanks for jumping in here. I have some experience with monorepos in OSS, more precisely Avro, and I believe this complicates things. Combining everything complicates the build process, and I often find myself fixing things in the PHP client while we are trying to get a Java patch rel

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

+1 on the Rust client. We have a Swift, Go and soon a Rust client - I'm wondering if we should manage these in a single monorepo, rather than one per client, with just a separate top-level folder per language. This would make it easy to manage all clients, add features across clients, add more cl

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

Thanks Denny and Jules for the response. It seems there is no objection about this proposal, would some committer/PMC member help to create the repo? On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 3:45 AM Jules Damji wrote: > +1 in this effort. > — > Sent from my iPhone > Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) > > On May 9,

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

+1 in this effort.—Sent from my iPhonePardon the dumb thumb typos :)On May 9, 2025, at 1:53 AM, Renjie Liu wrote:Hi, All:I'd like to propose to add a new Apache Spark repository for `Spark Connect Client for Rust`.https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-rustThere are already some efforts for buil

Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Rust language

Hey Renjie, I think this is a great idea and it certainly helps "connect" with the Rust community to collaborate with the Spark community. I would love to help with this particular effort as well, eh?! Thanks for initiating this! Denny On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 1:53 AM Renjie Liu wrote: > Hi,