Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 9:58 PM Xiao Li wrote: > +1 > > Dongjoon Hyun 于2025年1月11日周六 12:47写道： > >> +1 >> >> Dongjoon >> >> On 2025/01/10 00:57:25 Ye Zhou wrote: >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 3:02 PM Sakthi wrote: >> > >> > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > Sakthi >> >

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 Dongjoon Hyun 于2025年1月11日周六 12:47写道： > +1 > > Dongjoon > > On 2025/01/10 00:57:25 Ye Zhou wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 3:02 PM Sakthi wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Sakthi > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 9:16 AM Rozov, Vlad > > > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 Dongjoon On 2025/01/10 00:57:25 Ye Zhou wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 3:02 PM Sakthi wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Sakthi > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 9:16 AM Rozov, Vlad > > wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Vlad > >> > >> On Jan 8, 2025, at 8:28 

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 3:02 PM Sakthi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Sakthi > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 9:16 AM Rozov, Vlad > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Vlad >> >> On Jan 8, 2025, at 8:28 PM, Wenchen Fan wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Following the discussion[1], I'd like to

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 (non-binding) Sakthi On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 9:16 AM Rozov, Vlad wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Vlad > > On Jan 8, 2025, at 8:28 PM, Wenchen Fan wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the discussion[1], I'd like to start the vote for 'Use plain > text logs by default'. > > Note: This is not to over

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 (non-binding) Vlad On Jan 8, 2025, at 8:28 PM, Wenchen Fan wrote: Hi all, Following the discussion[1], I'd like to start the vote for 'Use plain text logs by default'. Note: This is not to overthrow the previous vote that adds the structured logging framework. The framework is still ther

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 08:41 DB Tsai wrote: > +1 > > DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1 > > On Jan 9, 2025, at 12:27 AM, Peter Toth wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 8:37 AM Allison Wang > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 2:45 PM L.

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1 > On Jan 9, 2025, at 12:27 AM, Peter Toth wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 8:37 AM Allison Wang > wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 2:45 PM L. C. Hsieh > >

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 8:37 AM Allison Wang wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 2:45 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:27 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:17 PM Jungtaek Lim < >> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 2:45 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:27 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:17 PM Jungtaek Lim < > kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> 2025년 1월 9일 (목) 오후 3:06, Cheng Pan 님이

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:27 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:17 PM Jungtaek Lim > wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> 2025년 1월 9일 (목) 오후 3:06, Cheng Pan 님이 작성: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Cheng Pan >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 9, 2025, at 12:28, Wenchen Fan wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:17 PM Jungtaek Lim wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > 2025년 1월 9일 (목) 오후 3:06, Cheng Pan 님이 작성: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks, >> Cheng Pan >> >> >> >> On Jan 9, 2025, at 12:28, Wenchen Fan wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Following the discussion[1], I'd like to start the vote for 'Us

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 (non-binding) 2025년 1월 9일 (목) 오후 3:06, Cheng Pan 님이 작성: > +1 > > Thanks, > Cheng Pan > > > > On Jan 9, 2025, at 12:28, Wenchen Fan wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the discussion[1], I'd like to start the vote for 'Use plain > text logs by default'. > > Note: This is not to overthrow the prev

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 Regards, Mridul On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 12:05 AM Cheng Pan wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > Cheng Pan > > > > On Jan 9, 2025, at 12:28, Wenchen Fan wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the discussion[1], I'd like to start the vote for 'Use plain > text logs by default'. > > Note: This is not to overth

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 Thanks, Cheng Pan > On Jan 9, 2025, at 12:28, Wenchen Fan wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the discussion[1], I'd like to start the vote for 'Use plain text > logs by default'. > > Note: This is not to overthrow the previous vote that adds the structured > logging framework. The framew

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 On 2025/01/09 06:01:01 Yuming Wang wrote: > +1. > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 12:52 PM beliefer wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > I think there are some learning curves when using it. Users must provide a > > good, visual, and easily readable JSON rendering tool themselves before > > they can turn on

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 15:01, Yuming Wang wrote: > +1. > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 12:52 PM beliefer wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> I think there are some learning curves when using it. Users must provide >> a good, visual, and easily readable JSON rendering tool themselves before >> they can turn on

Re: [VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1. On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 12:52 PM beliefer wrote: > +1 > > > I think there are some learning curves when using it. Users must provide a > good, visual, and easily readable JSON rendering tool themselves before > they can turn on this switch. > > > > At 2025-01-09 12:28:35, "Wenchen Fan" wrote

Re:[VOTE] Use plain text logs by default

+1 I think there are some learning curves when using it. Users must provide a good, visual, and easily readable JSON rendering tool themselves before they can turn on this switch. At 2025-01-09 12:28:35, "Wenchen Fan" wrote: Hi all, Following the discussion[1], I'd like to start t