No it does not -- although it'd benefit from some of the work to make
shuffle more robust.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:45 PM, kiran lonikar wrote:
> So does not benefit from Project Tungsten right?
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
>
>> It's a completely different path.
So does not benefit from Project Tungsten right?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> It's a completely different path.
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:37 PM, kiran lonikar wrote:
>
>> I would like to know if Hive on Spark uses or shares the execution code
>> with Spark SQL
It's a completely different path.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:37 PM, kiran lonikar wrote:
> I would like to know if Hive on Spark uses or shares the execution code
> with Spark SQL or DataFrames?
>
> More specifically, does Hive on Spark benefit from the changes made to
> Spark SQL, project Tung
I would like to know if Hive on Spark uses or shares the execution code
with Spark SQL or DataFrames?
More specifically, does Hive on Spark benefit from the changes made to
Spark SQL, project Tungsten? Or is it completely different execution path
where it creates its own plan and executes on RDD?
