Re: Changing how we compute release hashes

gt;> ------------------ >>>> *From:* Sean Owen >>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 16, 2018 9:51:49 AM >>>> *To:* Felix Cheung >>>> *Cc:* rb...@netflix.com; Nicholas Chammas; Spark dev list >>>> >>>> *Subject:* Re: Ch

Re: Changing how we compute release hashes

> +1 there >>> >>> -- >>> *From:* Sean Owen >>> *Sent:* Friday, March 16, 2018 9:51:49 AM >>> *To:* Felix Cheung >>> *Cc:* rb...@netflix.com; Nicholas Chammas; Spark dev list >>> >>> *Subject:* Re:

Re: Changing how we compute release hashes

c:* rb...@netflix.com; Nicholas Chammas; Spark dev list >> >> *Subject:* Re: Changing how we compute release hashes >> I think the issue with that is that OS X doesn't have "sha512sum". Both >> it and Linux have "shasum -a 512" though. >> >&g

Re: Changing how we compute release hashes

cholas Chammas; Spark dev list > > *Subject:* Re: Changing how we compute release hashes > I think the issue with that is that OS X doesn't have "sha512sum". Both it > and Linux have "shasum -a 512" though. > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:05 AM Felix Cheu

Re: Changing how we compute release hashes

+1 there From: Sean Owen Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 9:51:49 AM To: Felix Cheung Cc: rb...@netflix.com; Nicholas Chammas; Spark dev list Subject: Re: Changing how we compute release hashes I think the issue with that is that OS X doesn't have "sha512

Re: Changing how we compute release hashes

um? That would output the right format that is in turns > verifiable. > > > -- > *From:* Ryan Blue > *Sent:* Friday, March 16, 2018 8:31:45 AM > *To:* Nicholas Chammas > *Cc:* Spark dev list > *Subject:* Re: Changing how we compute release hashes &

Re: Changing how we compute release hashes

: Re: Changing how we compute release hashes +1 It's possible to produce the same file with gpg, but the sha*sum utilities are a bit easier to remember the syntax for. On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Nicholas Chammas mailto:nicholas.cham...@gmail.com>> wrote: To verify that I’ve d

Re: Changing how we compute release hashes

+1 It's possible to produce the same file with gpg, but the sha*sum utilities are a bit easier to remember the syntax for. On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Nicholas Chammas < nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: > To verify that I’ve downloaded a Hadoop release correctly, I can just do > this: > >

Changing how we compute release hashes

To verify that I’ve downloaded a Hadoop release correctly, I can just do this: $ shasum --check hadoop-2.7.5.tar.gz.sha256 hadoop-2.7.5.tar.gz: OK However, since we generate Spark release hashes with GPG