Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-14 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
Yuming, you replied to a wrong thread mistakenly I suspect :-). On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 08:13, Yuming Wang wrote: > This release uses Parquet 1.15.1. It seems Parquet 1.15.1 may cause > deadlocks. > > > Found one Java-level deadlock: > > = > > "Executor 566 task launch

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-14 Thread Yuming Wang
This release uses Parquet 1.15.1. It seems Parquet 1.15.1 may cause deadlocks. Found one Java-level deadlock: = "Executor 566 task launch worker for task 202024534, task 19644.1 in stage 13967543.0 of app application_1736396393732_100191": waiting to lock monitor

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-11 Thread John Zhuge
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 3:47 AM Ruifeng Zheng wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 12:37 PM Walaa Eldin Moustafa < > wa.moust...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 6:52 PM Liu Cao wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-11 Thread Ruifeng Zheng
+1 On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 12:37 PM Walaa Eldin Moustafa wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 6:52 PM Liu Cao wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:51 AM Prashant Singh >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:46 AM Xiao Li wr

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-10 Thread Walaa Eldin Moustafa
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 6:52 PM Liu Cao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:51 AM Prashant Singh > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:46 AM Xiao Li wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 00:57 John Zhuge wrote:

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-10 Thread Liu Cao
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:51 AM Prashant Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:46 AM Xiao Li wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 00:57 John Zhuge wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:11 PM Jacky Lee wrote:

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-10 Thread Kent Yao
+1 (binding) Kent Yao Yang Jie 于2025年4月10日周四 10:27写道： > +1 (binding) > > On 2025/04/10 02:20:02 Cheng Pan wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Cheng Pan > > > > > > > > > On Apr 9, 2025, at 22:22, Sandy Ryza wrote: > > > > > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, s

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-10 Thread Prashant Singh
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:46 AM Xiao Li wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 00:57 John Zhuge wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:11 PM Jacky Lee wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Kent Yao 于2025年4月10日周四 12:00写道： >>> > >>> > +1 (binding) >

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-10 Thread Xiao Li
+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 00:57 John Zhuge wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:11 PM Jacky Lee wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Kent Yao 于2025年4月10日周四 12:00写道： >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > Kent Yao >> > >> > Yang Jie 于2025年4月10日周四 10:27写道： >> >> >> >> +1 (bindi

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-10 Thread John Zhuge
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:11 PM Jacky Lee wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Kent Yao 于2025年4月10日周四 12:00写道： > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Kent Yao > > > > Yang Jie 于2025年4月10日周四 10:27写道： > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On 2025/04/10 02:20:02 Cheng Pan wrote: > >> > +1 (non-binding) > >

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Jacky Lee
+1 (binding) Kent Yao 于2025年4月10日周四 12:00写道： > > +1 (binding) > > Kent Yao > > Yang Jie 于2025年4月10日周四 10:27写道： >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On 2025/04/10 02:20:02 Cheng Pan wrote: >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Cheng Pan >> > >> > >> > >> > > On Apr 9, 2025, at 22:22, Sandy Ryza wrote

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Yang Jie
+1 (binding) On 2025/04/10 02:20:02 Cheng Pan wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Cheng Pan > > > > > On Apr 9, 2025, at 22:22, Sandy Ryza wrote: > > > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move > > to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pip

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Cheng Pan
+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Cheng Pan > On Apr 9, 2025, at 22:22, Sandy Ryza wrote: > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move to > a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: * > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f8

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Wenchen Fan
+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 7:30 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 3:42 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > >> I will shephard. >> >> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 07:28, Anton Okolnychyi >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> - Anton >>> >>> ср, 9

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Szehon Ho
+1 (non-binding) Thanks Szehon On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 3:42 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > I will shephard. > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 07:28, Anton Okolnychyi > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> - Anton >> >> ср, 9 квіт. 2025 р. о 15:01 Jungtaek Lim >> пише: >> >>> Btw who is going to shephard this

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
I will shephard. On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 07:28, Anton Okolnychyi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - Anton > > ср, 9 квіт. 2025 р. о 15:01 Jungtaek Lim > пише: > >> Btw who is going to shephard this SPIP? I don't see this in the >> doc/JIRA/discussion thread. I understand there are PMC members in th

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Anton Okolnychyi
+1 (non-binding) - Anton ср, 9 квіт. 2025 р. о 15:01 Jungtaek Lim пише: > Btw who is going to shephard this SPIP? I don't see this in the > doc/JIRA/discussion thread. I understand there are PMC members in the > author list, but probably good to be explicit about "who" is > shepherding this SPI

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Jungtaek Lim
Btw who is going to shephard this SPIP? I don't see this in the doc/JIRA/discussion thread. I understand there are PMC members in the author list, but probably good to be explicit about "who" is shepherding this SPIP. On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:22 PM Sandy Ryza wrote: > We started to get some vot

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
+1!!! On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 6:03 AM Jungtaek Lim wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:22 PM Sandy Ryza wrote: > >> We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to >> move to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. >> >> *Discussion t

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Jungtaek Lim
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:22 PM Sandy Ryza wrote: > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move > to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: * > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f829ps0bog41fjoqc45xk7m5

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Holden Karau
+1 Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau Fight Health Insurance: https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/ Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 YouTube Live Streams: https://www.yo

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Mark Hamstra
+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:22 AM Sandy Ryza wrote: > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move to > a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: * > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f829ps0bog41fjoqc45xk7m574ly > *SPIP

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Martin Grund
+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:43 PM Denny Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:03 Chao Sun wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 10:55 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:22 AM Sandy Ryza wrote: >>> > >>> > We started to get some votes o

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Mich Talebzadeh
+1 Dr Mich Talebzadeh, Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR view my Linkedin profile On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 20:05, Gengliang Wang wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:57 AM Martin Grund > wr

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Gengliang Wang
+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:57 AM Martin Grund wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:43 PM Denny Lee wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:03 Chao Sun wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 10:55 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote: >>> +1 On Wed, Apr 9, 20

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Denny Lee
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:03 Chao Sun wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 10:55 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:22 AM Sandy Ryza wrote: >> > >> > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to >> move to a formal vote on a

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Chao Sun
+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 10:55 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:22 AM Sandy Ryza wrote: > > > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to > move to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > > > *Discussion thread: * > http

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread DB Tsai
+1. Really exciting to see the community actively investing on decorative pipeline APIs and materialized views. Thanks. DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1 > On Apr 9, 2025, at 9:43 AM, Jules Damji wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Excuse the thumb typos > > > On W

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread L. C. Hsieh
+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:22 AM Sandy Ryza wrote: > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move to > a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: * > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f829ps0bog41fjoqc45xk7m574ly > *SPIP

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Peter Toth
+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:40 PM DB Tsai wrote: > +1. > > Really exciting to see the community actively investing on decorative > pipeline APIs and materialized views. Thanks. > > DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1 > > On Apr 9, 2025, at 9:43 AM, Jules Damji wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Michael Armbrust
+1 (binding) On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 10:37 AM Reynold Xin wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Super exciting to have this! > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:43 AM Jules Damji wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Excuse the thumb typos >> >> >> On Wed, 09 Apr 2025 at 7:22 AM, Sandy Ryza wrote: >> >>> We started

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Reynold Xin
+1 (binding) Super exciting to have this! On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:43 AM Jules Damji wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Excuse the thumb typos > > > On Wed, 09 Apr 2025 at 7:22 AM, Sandy Ryza wrote: > >> We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to >> move to a formal vote

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Jules Damji
+1 (non-binding) Excuse the thumb typos On Wed, 09 Apr 2025 at 7:22 AM, Sandy Ryza wrote: > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move > to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: * > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread huaxin gao
+1 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:07 AM Rishab Joshi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:05 AM Sem wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 07:22 -0700, Sandy Ryza wrote: >> >> We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to >> move to a formal

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Rishab Joshi
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:05 AM Sem wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 07:22 -0700, Sandy Ryza wrote: > > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move > to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion th

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Sem
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 07:22 -0700, Sandy Ryza wrote: > We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to > move to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. > > *Discussion thread: > * https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f829ps0bog41fjoqc45xk7

[VOTE] SPIP: Declarative Pipelines

2025-04-09 Thread Sandy Ryza
We started to get some votes on the discussion thread, so I'd like to move to a formal vote on adding support for declarative pipelines. *Discussion thread: * https://lists.apache.org/thread/lsv8f829ps0bog41fjoqc45xk7m574ly *SPIP:* https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PsSTngFuRVEOvUGzp_25CQL1yfzFHF