Re:Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 At 2025-02-26 13:48:44, "Yuming Wang" wrote: +1 On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 1:42 PM Shubham Patel wrote: +1 On Sun, 23 Feb 2025, 21:21 Max Gekk, wrote: Hi Spark devs, Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. The SPIP aims to add a new data type T

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 1:42 PM Shubham Patel wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, 23 Feb 2025, 21:21 Max Gekk, wrote: > >> Hi Spark devs, >> >> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP >> [2]. The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type >> should c

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Sun, 23 Feb 2025, 21:21 Max Gekk, wrote: > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type > should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL > standard.

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 (non-binding) Thank you, Vlad On Feb 25, 2025, at 1:33 AM, Sakthi wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:50 AM Kent Yao mailto:y...@apache.org>> wrote: +1(binding), Thank you, Max! Kent Armaan Sait mailto:armaansait...@gmail.com>> 于2025年2月25日周二 06:11写道： +1 Thanks & Regard

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:50 AM Kent Yao wrote: > +1(binding), > > Thank you, Max! > > Kent > > Armaan Sait 于2025年2月25日周二 06:11写道： > >> +1 >> >> *Thanks & Regards,* >> Armaan Sait >> *LinkedIn:* Armaan Sait | LinkedIn >> >> >> >> On S

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1(binding), Thank you, Max! Kent Armaan Sait 于2025年2月25日周二 06:11写道： > +1 > > *Thanks & Regards,* > Armaan Sait > *LinkedIn:* Armaan Sait | LinkedIn > > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 1

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 *Thanks & Regards,* Armaan Sait *LinkedIn:* Armaan Sait | LinkedIn On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge wrote: >> >

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On 2025/02/24 05:30:34 Jungtaek Lim wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:26 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 8:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On M

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:26 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 8:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge wrote: >>> +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 8:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> John Zhuge >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao >>> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> John Zhuge >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com >>> wrote: >>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > John Zhuge > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com >> wrote: >> >>> +1 it’s abt time. >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> > On Feb 23, 2025, a

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 (non-binding) John Zhuge On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com wrote: > >> +1 it’s abt time. >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Feb 23, 2025, at 12:25 PM, L. C. Hsieh wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com wrote: > +1 it’s abt time. > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Feb 23, 2025, at 12:25 PM, L. C. Hsieh wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk wrote: > >> > >> Hi Spark devs, > >> > >> Following the discussion [1], I'd

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 it’s abt time. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 23, 2025, at 12:25 PM, L. C. Hsieh wrote: > > +1 > >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk wrote: >> >> Hi Spark devs, >> >> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. >> The SPIP aims to add a new data typ

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk wrote: > > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type should > conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL stand

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Max! Kind regards, Fokko Op zo 23 feb 2025 om 19:35 schreef Ángel : > + 1 (non-binding) > > El dom, 23 feb 2025, 16:51, Max Gekk escribió: > >> Hi Spark devs, >> >> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP >> [2]. The SPIP aims to add a new

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+ 1 (non-binding) El dom, 23 feb 2025, 16:51, Max Gekk escribió: > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type > should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by th

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+ 1 (non-binding) Excuse the thumb typos On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 at 7:50 AM, Max Gekk wrote: > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type > should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk wrote: > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type > should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL > standa

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 for me following my recent comments on the discussion thread on this topic as well Dr Mich Talebzadeh, Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR view my Linkedin profile On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 at 17:16,

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

+1 Thank you, Max. Dongjoon. On 2025/02/23 15:49:58 Max Gekk wrote: > Hi Spark devs, > > Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. > The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type > should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined b

[VOTE] SPIP: Add the TIME data type

Hi Spark devs, Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL standard. This thread will be open for at least the next 72 hours. Ple