gt;>> Vaquar khan
>>>
>>> On Sep 10, 2017 5:18 AM, "Noman Khan" wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> --
>>>> *From:* wangzhenhua (G)
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, September 8, 2017 2:20:07 AM
>&g
7 AM
>>> *To:* Dongjoon Hyun; 蒋星博
>>> *Cc:* Michael Armbrust; Reynold Xin; Andrew Ash; Herman van Hövell tot
>>> Westerflier; Ryan Blue; Spark dev list; Suresh Thalamati; Wenchen Fan
>>> *Subject:* 答复: [VOTE] [SPIP] SPARK-15689: Data Source API V2 read path
>>>
man van Hövell tot
>> Westerflier; Ryan Blue; Spark dev list; Suresh Thalamati; Wenchen Fan
>> *Subject:* 答复: [VOTE] [SPIP] SPARK-15689: Data Source API V2 read path
>>
>>
>> +1 (non-binding) Great to see data source API is going to be improved!
>>
>>
>>
van Hövell tot
> Westerflier; Ryan Blue; Spark dev list; Suresh Thalamati; Wenchen Fan
> *Subject:* 答复: [VOTE] [SPIP] SPARK-15689: Data Source API V2 read path
>
>
> +1 (non-binding) Great to see data source API is going to be improved!
>
>
>
> best regards,
>
> -Zh
Westerflier; Ryan Blue; Spark dev list; Suresh Thalamati; Wenchen Fan
主题: Re: [VOTE] [SPIP] SPARK-15689: Data Source API V2 read path
+1 (non-binding).
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:46 PM, 蒋星博
mailto:jiangxb1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1
Reynold Xin mailto:r...@databricks.com>>于2017年9月7日
周四下午12
; Suresh Thalamati; Wenchen Fan
主题: Re: [VOTE] [SPIP] SPARK-15689: Data Source API V2 read path
+1 (non-binding).
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:46 PM, 蒋星博
mailto:jiangxb1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1
Reynold Xin mailto:r...@databricks.com>>于2017年9月7日
周四下午12:04写道：
+1 as well
On Thu, Sep 7,
+1 (non-binding).
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:46 PM, 蒋星博 wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Reynold Xin 于2017年9月7日 周四下午12:04写道：
>
>> +1 as well
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Michael Armbrust
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Ryan Blue
>>> wrote:
>>>
+1 (non-binding)
>>
+1
Reynold Xin 于2017年9月7日 周四下午12:04写道：
> +1 as well
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Michael Armbrust
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Ryan Blue
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks for making the updates reflected in the current PR. It would be
>>> great t
+1 as well
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Ryan Blue
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Thanks for making the updates reflected in the current PR. It would be
>> great to see the doc updated before it is finally published though
+1
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks for making the updates reflected in the current PR. It would be
> great to see the doc updated before it is finally published though.
>
> Right now it feels like this SPIP is focused more on getting the basics
> ri
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for making the updates reflected in the current PR. It would be
great to see the doc updated before it is finally published though.
Right now it feels like this SPIP is focused more on getting the basics
right for what many datasources are already doing in API V1 combined
+1 (binding)
I personally believe that there is quite a big difference between having a
generic data source interface with a low surface area and pushing down a
significant part of query processing into a datasource. The later has much
wider wider surface area and will require us to stabilize most
+0 (non-binding)
I think there are benefits to unifying all the Spark-internal datasources
into a common public API for sure. It will serve as a forcing function to
ensure that those internal datasources aren't advantaged vs datasources
developed externally as plugins to Spark, and that all Spark
+1 (non-binding)
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:29 PM, Wenchen Fan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the previous discussion, we decided to split the read and write path of
> data source v2 into 2 SPIPs, and I'm sending this email to call a vote for
> Data Source V2 read path only.
>
> The full document of
+1
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Xiao Li wrote:
> +1
>
> Xiao
>
> 2017-09-06 19:37 GMT-07:00 Wenchen Fan :
>
>> adding my own +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Wenchen Fan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> In the previous discussion, we decided to split the read and write path
>
+1
Xiao
2017-09-06 19:37 GMT-07:00 Wenchen Fan :
> adding my own +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Wenchen Fan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In the previous discussion, we decided to split the read and write path
>> of data source v2 into 2 SPIPs, and I'm sending this email to call
adding my own +1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Wenchen Fan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the previous discussion, we decided to split the read and write path of
> data source v2 into 2 SPIPs, and I'm sending this email to call a vote for
> Data Source V2 read path only.
>
> The full docum
Hi all,
In the previous discussion, we decided to split the read and write path of
data source v2 into 2 SPIPs, and I'm sending this email to call a vote for
Data Source V2 read path only.
The full document of the Data Source API V2 is:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1n_vUVbF4KD3gxTmkNEon5qdQ
18 matches
Mail list logo
