Thank you.
On 11/25/2016 02:02 PM, Takeshi Yamamuro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems we forget to pass `parts:Array[Partition]` into `JDBCRelation`.
> This was removed in this
> commit:
> https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b3130c7b6a1ab4975023f08c3ab02ee8d2c7e995#diff-f70bda59304588cc3abfa3a9840653f4L
I believe https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975 fixes this regression.
I am sorry for the trouble.
2016-11-25 22:23 GMT+09:00 Sean Owen :
> See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15499#discussion_r89008564 in
> particular. Hyukjin / Xiao do we need to undo part of this change?
>
>
> On Fr
See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15499#discussion_r89008564 in
particular. Hyukjin / Xiao do we need to undo part of this change?
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 1:02 PM Takeshi Yamamuro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems we forget to pass `parts:Array[Partition]` into `JDBCRelation`.
> This was removed in
Hi,
Seems we forget to pass `parts:Array[Partition]` into `JDBCRelation`.
This was removed in this commit:
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b3130c7b6a1ab4975023f08c3ab02ee8d2c7e995#diff-f70bda59304588cc3abfa3a9840653f4L237
// maropu
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Maciej Szymkiewicz
wrot
Hi,
I've been reviewing my notes to https://git.io/v1UVC using Spark built
from 51b1c1551d3a7147403b9e821fcc7c8f57b4824c and it looks like JDBC
ignores both:
* (columnName, lowerBound, upperBound, numPartitions)
* predicates
and loads everything into a single partition. Can anyone confirm th
