Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36449243
I think the asf git bot will close this once the change is sync-ed on
github. If it doesn't get closed tomorrow morning, please close this manually.
Thanks!
---
If your pr
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36449182
Do I need to close it? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36449165
Thanks. I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36414270
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36414271
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12938/
---
If your project i
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413838
It is running now. Let's wait for Jenkins to come back.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413688
It seems that there are still some problems. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413637
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12936/
---
If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413636
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413558
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413559
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413420
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413377
It's not you. There was somehow two Jenkins pull request builder setup ...
I Just removed one of them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413338
@rxin It seems that I rebased and squashed the commits which made Jenkins
unhappy. Could you ask Jenkins to build again? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413276
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413273
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413274
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413277
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder%20(incubator)/1/
---
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#discussion_r10188617
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescent.scala
---
@@ -149,7 +149,14 @@ object GradientDescent extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413264
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413254
Jenkins, add to whitelist.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36413266
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#discussion_r10188555
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescent.scala
---
@@ -149,7 +149,14 @@ object GradientDescent extends Logging {
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#discussion_r10181447
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescent.scala
---
@@ -149,7 +149,13 @@ object GradientDescent extends Logging {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#discussion_r10178907
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescentSuite.scala
---
@@ -104,4 +104,45 @@ class GradientDescentSuite extends FunSui
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#discussion_r10178847
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescent.scala
---
@@ -149,7 +149,13 @@ object GradientDescent extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36306198
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
GitHub user dbtsai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40
Initialized the regVal for first iteration in SGD optimizer
Ported from https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pull/633
In runMiniBatchSGD, the regVal (for 1st iter) should be initialized
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36306177
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
30 matches
Mail list logo
