Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27#issuecomment-36433891
I've merged this into master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27#issuecomment-36277558
I see two issues: 1) The deterministic nature of the current scheduler
places tasks on the same small set of machines while leaving others largely
unused; 2) There is n
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27#issuecomment-36275312
@shivaram I understand your cautiousness and I agree with Kay on that we
would be careful when adding the complexity to the already-complex code base.
So, I don't mind cl
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27#issuecomment-36271766
IMHO it would be better to try the simpler solution first and see how it
works -- With a large enough number of executors I think the probability of
seeing the same execut
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27#issuecomment-36238278
en...it's much simpler...but randomization can just mitigate the issue with
some probability?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27#issuecomment-36224189
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27#issuecomment-36224190
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12912/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27#issuecomment-36221897
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27#issuecomment-36221889
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user kayousterhout opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27
[SPARK-979] Randomize order of offers.
This commit randomizes the order of resource offers to avoid scheduling
all tasks on the same small set of machines.
This is a much simpler sol
11 matches
Mail list logo